ArticleEuropean journal of rheumatology2022
Treatment with biologic DMARDs may not adversely affect lung nodules in rheumatoid arthritis patients.
Article in European journal of rheumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiological and serological predictors of cavitary transformation in rheumatoid arthritis-associated pulmonary nodules: a retrospective cohort study.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
- JAK inhibitors for the treatment of rheumatoid nodules.JAAD case reports · 2025Article
- ACPA is a main risk factor for CT-proven pulmonary nodule progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveLung nodules (LNs) impose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in patients with rheuma- toid arthritis (RA) due to unpredictable outcomes. Potential induction of nodulosis with the use of con- ventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARD) and lack of knowledge regarding the effect of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs)/tofacitinib on the LN raise concerns and have an impact on treatment decisions. This study aims to evaluate the possible effects of the bDMARDs/tofa- citinib and csDMARDS on LNs observed in RA patients.
methodsElectronic health records of RA patients who had LNs detected on computed tomography (CT) between January 2015 and December 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with follow- up CT images were included in the study. Baseline and follow-up images were meticulously examined for the number, size, attenuation, and cavity formation. Clinical, histopathologic, and laboratory find- ings were analyzed.
resultsForty-two RA patients with LNs were studied, 21 were on bDMARDs/tofacitinib (11 females, mean age: 59.7 6 8.4) and 21 were on csDMARDs (12 females, mean age: 71.4 6 8.3). The proportion of patients with progressed nodules during follow-up was comparable between groups (six patients in bDMARDs/tofacitinib vs seven patients in csDMARDs). Progression of LNs was observed in six patients in the bDMARDs/tofacitinib group: three in anti-TNFa, two in rituximab, and one in abatacept users and none in tofacitinib users.
conclusionOur results suggest that the risk of progression in LNs in RA patients with use of bDMARDs/tofacitinib might not impose a higher risk compared to csDMARDs. Moreover, bDMARDs/ tofacitinib might result in regression in LNs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.