Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35156603›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2022

The quality of mental health care delivered to patients with schizophrenia and related disorders in the Italian mental health system. The QUADIM project: a multi-regional Italian investigation based on healthcare utilisation databases.

Antonio Lora, Matteo Monzio Compagnoni, Liliana Allevi, Angelo Barbato, Flavia Carle, Barbara D'avanzo, Teresa Di Fiandra, Lucia Ferrara, Andrea Gaddini, Melania Leogrande and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio LoraDepartment of Mental Health and Addiction Services, ASST Lecco, Lecco, Italy.
Matteo Monzio CompagnoniNational Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2105-4572
Liliana AlleviDepartment of Mental Health and Addiction Services, ASST Lecco, Lecco, Italy.
Angelo BarbatoUnit for Quality of Care and Rights Promotion in Mental Health, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
Flavia CarleNational Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Barbara D'avanzoUnit for Quality of Care and Rights Promotion in Mental Health, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
Teresa Di FiandraMinistry of Health, Rome, Italy.
Lucia FerraraCentre of Research on Health and Social Care Management, SDA Bocconi School of Management (Bocconi University) Milan, Milan, Italy.
Andrea GaddiniAgency for Public Health, Lazio Region, Rome, Italy.
Melania LeograndeNational Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Alessio SaponaroHealth and Social Policies, Emilia-Romagna Region, Bologna, Italy.
Salvatore ScondottoNational Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Valeria D TozziCentre of Research on Health and Social Care Management, SDA Bocconi School of Management (Bocconi University) Milan, Milan, Italy.
Simona CarboneDepartment of Health Planning, Italian Health Ministry, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni CorraoNational Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
‘QUADIM project’ and ‘Monitoring and assessing diagnostic-therapeutic paths (MAP)’ working groups of the Italian Ministry of Health
University of Milano-Bicocca · ITAziende Socio Sanitarie Territoriali di LeccoBocconi University · ITMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · ITMinistero della Salute · ITAgenzia Regionale per la Protezione Ambientale del Piemonte · ITAgenzia Sanitaria e Sociale Regionale · ITMarche Polytechnic University · ITRegione Siciliana · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo evaluate the quality of mental health care delivered to patients with schizophrenia and related disorders taken-in-care by mental health services in four Italian regions (Lombardy, Emilia-Romagna, Lazio, Sicily).

methodsThirty-one clinical indicators concerning accessibility, appropriateness, continuity and safety were defined and estimated using healthcare utilisation (HCU) databases, containing data on mental health treatments, hospital admissions, outpatient interventions, lab tests and drug prescriptions.

resultsA total of 70 586 prevalent patients with schizophrenia and related disorders treated in 2015 were identified, of whom 1752 were newly taken-in-care by the facilities of regional mental health services. For most patients community care was accessible and moderately intensive. However, care pathways were not implemented based on a structured assessment and only half of the patients received psychosocial treatments. One patient out of ten had access to psychological interventions and psychoeducation. Activities specifically addressed to families involved a third of prevalent patients and less than half of new patients. One patient out of six was admitted to a community residential facility, and one out of ten to a General Hospital Psychiatric Ward (GHPW); higher values were identified in new cases. In general hospitals, few patients had a length of stay (LoS) of more than 30 days, while one-fifth of the admissions were followed by readmission within 30 days of discharge. For two-thirds of patients, continuity of community care was met, and six times out of ten a discharge from a GHPW was followed by an outpatient contact within 2 weeks. For cases newly taken-in-care, the continuity of community care was uncommon, while the readiness of outpatient contacts after discharge was slightly more frequent. Most of the patients received antipsychotic medication, but their adherence to long-term treatment was low. Antipsychotic polytherapy was frequent and the control of metabolic side effects was poor. The variability between regions was high and consistent in all the quality domains.

conclusionsThe Italian mental health system could be improved by increasing the accessibility to psychosocial interventions, improving the quality of care for newly taken-in-care patients, focusing on somatic health and mortality, and reducing regional variability. Clinical indicators demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of the mental health system in these regions, and, as HCU databases, they could be useful tools in the routine assessment of mental healthcare quality at regional and national levels.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental Health ServicesSchizophreniaHumansItalyMental HealthPatient Acceptance of Health CareClinical indicatorshealthcare utilisation databasequality of mental healthcareschizophrenia and related disorders

Identifiers

PMID35156603
PMCPMC8851066
OpenAlexW4212989500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.