Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35156600›Full record

ArticleInfection control and hospital epidemiology2022

Examining drivers of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine hesitancy among healthcare workers.

Mandy C Swann, Jesse Bendetson, Alexis Johnson, Maimuna Jatta, Charles J Schleupner, Anthony Baffoe-Bonnie

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mandy C SwannInfection Prevention and Control, Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, Virginia.ORCID 0000-0003-0348-8024
Jesse BendetsonVirginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia.
Alexis JohnsonInfection Prevention and Control, Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, Virginia.
Maimuna JattaInfection Prevention and Control, Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, Virginia.ORCID 0000-0002-5160-1792
Charles J SchleupnerVirginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia.
Anthony Baffoe-BonnieInfection Prevention and Control, Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, Virginia.ORCID 0000-0002-6316-7719
Carilion Clinic · US

Funding

The integrated Translational Health Research Institute of Virginia (iTHRIV): Using Data to Improve HealthUL1TR003015 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI BROWN, DONALD E, JOHNSTON, KAREN C. · 2019 to 2023
$20.3M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR003016 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI PAPIN, JASON, WORRALL, BRADFORD B · 2019 to 2023
$3.9M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR003016NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess characteristics and perceptions associated with vaccine hesitancy among healthcare workers to increase coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine uptake in this population.

designCross-sectional quantitative survey.

settingA not-for-profit healthcare system in southwestern Virginia.

participantsA convenience sample of 2,720 employees of a not-for-profit healthcare system.

methodsBetween March 15 and 29, 2021, we conducted an Internet-based survey. Our questionnaire assessed sociodemographic and work-related characteristics, vaccine experience and intentions, agreement with vaccine-related perceptions, the most important reasons for getting or not getting vaccinated, and trusted sources of information about COVID-19. We used χ

resultsOverall, 18% of respondents were classified as vaccine hesitant. Characteristics significantly associated with hesitancy included Black race, younger age, not having a high-risk household member, and prior personal experience with COVID-19 illness. Vaccine hesitancy was also significantly associated with many vaccine-related perceptions, including concerns about short-term and long-term side effects and a belief that the vaccines are not effective. Among vaccine-acceptant participants, wanting to protect others and wanting to help end the pandemic were the most common reasons for getting vaccinated. Personal physicians were cited most frequently as trusted sources of information about COVID-19 among both vaccine-hesitant and vaccine-acceptant respondents.

conclusionsEducational interventions to decrease vaccine hesitancy among healthcare workers should focus on alleviating safety concerns, emphasizing vaccine efficacy, and appealing to a sense of duty. Such interventions should target younger adult audiences. Personal physicians may also be an effective avenue for reducing hesitancy among their patients through patient-centered discussions.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesHealth PersonnelHumansVaccinationVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19 vaccineshealthcare workersVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID35156600
PMCPMC9379266
OpenAlexW4213137323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.