Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35156404›Full record

Trial reportBehavior modification2022

Cognitive Restructuring Before Versus After Exposure: Effect on Expectancy and Outcome in Individuals With Claustrophobia.

Kirstyn L Krause, Naomi Koerner, Martin M Antony

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Behavior modification, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kirstyn L KrauseRyerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7744-9848
Naomi KoernerRyerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Martin M AntonyRyerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maximizing the discrepancy between expected and actual outcomes during exposure (i.e., expectancy violation) is thought to optimize inhibitory learning. The current study examined Craske et al.'s suggestion that engaging in cognitive restructuring (CR) before exposure prematurely reduces expectancy and mitigates outcomes. Participants (

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyImplosive TherapyPhobic DisordersCognitive RestructuringHumansLearningcognitive behavior therapycognitive restructuringexpectancyexpectancy violationexposure therapyinhibitory learning model

Identifiers

PMID35156404
PMCPMC9523819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.