Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35156205›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2022

Effects of Medicare advantage on patterns of end-of-life care among Medicare decedents.

Sungchul Park, Joan M Teno, Lindsay White, Norma B Coe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Medicare Advantage Enrollment in Nursing Homes: 2010-2023.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sungchul ParkDepartment of Health Management and Policy, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7546-9685
Joan M TenoDivision of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Lindsay WhiteThe Center for Health Care Quality and Outcomes at RTI International, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Norma B CoeDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1228-0938
Drexel University · USOregon Health & Science University · USRTI International · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

End of Life Care: Estimating the Effectiveness of 20 years of Health System ReformRF1AG062595 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI COE, NORMA B · 2019 to 2019
$2.4M
NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG062595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the effects of Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollment on patterns of end-of-life care. DATA SOURCES: We used data from the Master Beneficiary Summary File, the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review, hospice claims, the Minimum Data Set, the Outcome and Assessment Information Set, the Area Health Resources File, and Geographic Variation Public Use File for 2012-2014. STUDY

designTo address selective enrollment into MA, we exploited a discontinuity in payment rates by county population (urban floor payments) as an instrument. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodsWe identified Medicare beneficiaries continuously enrolled in MA or TM during their last year of life between 2012 and 2014 using Medicare administrative data. PRINCIPAL

findingsWe did not find evidence that MA enrollment led to a change in hospital admissions in the last 30 days of life, but MA enrollment decreased hospital as the site of death by 11.0 (95% CI: -13.9 to -8.1) percentage points. Once hospitalized, however, MA enrollment increased use of intensive care by 6.7 (95% CI: 0.3 to 13.1) percentage points and non-invasive mechanical ventilation by 9.2 (95% CI: 5.5 to 12.9) percentage points. MA enrollment increased hospice use by 6.2 (95% CI: 2.3 to 10.1) percentage points at time of death and 7.7 (95% CI: 3.8 to 11.6) percentage points in the last 30 days of life. Particularly, MA enrollment increased hospice admissions among those who were admitted to the hospital within 30 days prior to hospice admission by 18.8 (95% CI: 13.8 to 23.8) percentage points. However, MA enrollment decreased hospice admissions among those who were admitted to home health within 30 days prior to hospice admission by 18.6 (95% CI: -21.9 to -15.2) percentage points.

conclusionsMA plans may improve end-of-life care by reducing hospital death while also improving access to hospice, especially among recently hospitalized persons.

Indexed as

Hospice CareMedicare Part CTerminal CareAgedHospitalizationHospitalsHumansUnited Statesend-of-life carehospiceMedicare advantagetraditional Medicare

Identifiers

PMID35156205
PMCPMC9264456
OpenAlexW4213017936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.