ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2022
A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of drug forgiveness.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Economic evidence of alternative formulations and routes of administration for identical active pharmaceutical ingredient: a systematic review.Health economics review · 2026Review
- Incretin mimetics for weight loss forgive nonadherence.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Article
- Editorial: Mathematical modeling of medication nonadherence.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Clinical and economic consequences of medication nonadherence: a review of systematic reviews.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Relative Forgiveness of Different Allopurinol Implementation Patterns in People with Gout and their Impact on Clinical Outcomes: a Simulation Study.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2025Article
- Non-Adherence in Adult Male Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Relative Forgiveness of Amoxicillin versus Respiratory Fluoroquinolones.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nonadherence to medication is a major public health problem. To combat nonadherence, some clinicians have suggested using "forgiving" drugs, which maintain efficacy in spite of delayed or missed doses. What pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) factors make a drug forgiving? In this paper, we address this question by analyzing a linear PK/PD model for a patient with imperfect adherence. We assume that the drug effect is far from maximal and consider direct effect, effect compartment (biophase), and indirect response PD models. We prove that the average drug effect relative to the clinically desired effect is simply the fraction of prescribed doses actually taken by the patient. Hence, under these assumptions, drug forgiveness cannot be defined in terms of the average effect. We argue that forgiveness should instead be understood in terms of effect fluctuations. We prove that the rates of PK absorption, PK elimination, and PD elimination are exactly equivalent for determining effect fluctuations. We prove all the aforementioned results for any pattern of nonadherence, including late doses, missed doses, drug holidays, extra doses, etc. To obtain quantitative estimates of effect fluctuations, we consider a simple statistical pattern of nonadherence and analytically calculate the coefficient of variation of effect. We further show how effect fluctuations can be reduced by taking an extra "make up" dose following a missed dose if any one of the aforementioned PK/PD rates is sufficiently slow. We illustrate some of our results for a nonlinear indirect response model of metformin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35156179What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.