Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35156179›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2022

A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of drug forgiveness.

Noel P McAllister, Sean D Lawley

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Incretin mimetics for weight loss forgive nonadherence.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Noel P McAllisterDepartment of Mathematics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Sean D LawleyDepartment of Mathematics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. lawley@math.utah.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2208-026X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonadherence to medication is a major public health problem. To combat nonadherence, some clinicians have suggested using "forgiving" drugs, which maintain efficacy in spite of delayed or missed doses. What pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) factors make a drug forgiving? In this paper, we address this question by analyzing a linear PK/PD model for a patient with imperfect adherence. We assume that the drug effect is far from maximal and consider direct effect, effect compartment (biophase), and indirect response PD models. We prove that the average drug effect relative to the clinically desired effect is simply the fraction of prescribed doses actually taken by the patient. Hence, under these assumptions, drug forgiveness cannot be defined in terms of the average effect. We argue that forgiveness should instead be understood in terms of effect fluctuations. We prove that the rates of PK absorption, PK elimination, and PD elimination are exactly equivalent for determining effect fluctuations. We prove all the aforementioned results for any pattern of nonadherence, including late doses, missed doses, drug holidays, extra doses, etc. To obtain quantitative estimates of effect fluctuations, we consider a simple statistical pattern of nonadherence and analytically calculate the coefficient of variation of effect. We further show how effect fluctuations can be reduced by taking an extra "make up" dose following a missed dose if any one of the aforementioned PK/PD rates is sufficiently slow. We illustrate some of our results for a nonlinear indirect response model of metformin.

Indexed as

ForgivenessMetforminDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansLinear ModelsModels, BiologicalNonlinear DynamicsMetforminForgivenessMedication adherenceMissed dosesStochastics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.