Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35156128›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2022

Fiddler crab electroretinograms reveal vast circadian shifts in visual sensitivity and temporal summation in dim light.

Emelie A Brodrick, Martin J How, Jan M Hemmi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Views from 'crabworld': the spatial distribution of light in a tropical mudflat.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Emelie A BrodrickLiving Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7349-1494
Martin J HowSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5135-8828
Jan M HemmiSchool of Biological Sciences & UWA Oceans Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4629-9362
The University of Western Australia · AUUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Australian Research Councilfunder-list DP180100491Royal SocietyThe Royal Society UF140558University of Exeter
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many animals with compound eyes undergo major optical changes to adjust visual sensitivity from day to night, often under control of a circadian clock. In fiddler crabs, this presents most conspicuously in the huge volume increase of photopigment-packed rhabdoms and the widening of crystalline cone apertures at night. These changes are hypothesised to adjust the light flux to the photoreceptors and to alter optical sensitivity as the eye moves between light- and dark-adapted states. Here, we compared optical sensitivity in fiddler crab (Gelasimus dampieri) eyes during daytime and night via three electroretinogram (ERG) experiments performed on light- and dark-adapted crabs. (1) Light intensity required to elicit a threshold ERG response varied over six orders of magnitude, allowing more sensitive vision for discriminating small contrasts in dim light after dusk. During daytime, the eyes remained relatively insensitive, which would allow effective vision on bright mudflats, even after prolonged dark adaptation. (2) Flicker fusion frequency (FFF) experiments indicated that temporal summation is employed in dim light to increase light-gathering integration times and enhance visual sensitivity during both night and day. (3) ERG responses to flickering lights during 60 min of dark adaptation increased at a faster rate and to a greater extent after sunset compared with daytime. However, even brief, dim and intermittent light exposure strongly disrupted dark-adaptation processes. Together, these findings demonstrate effective light adaptation to optimise vision over the large range of light intensities that these animals experience.

Indexed as

BrachyuraCircadian ClocksAnimalsDark AdaptationElectroretinographyRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsCompound eyesDark adaptationGelasimus, ERGLight intensity

Identifiers

PMID35156128
PMCPMC8976941
OpenAlexW4212855380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.