ArticleJASA express letters2022
Interpreting the interphase gap effect on the electrically evoked compound action potential.
Article in JASA express letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Interphase Gap Effect in Cochlear Implant Users: Biological Basis, Parameter Selection, Analytical Methods, and Quantitative Scales.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026Article
- Establishing reliable neural health measures in adult cochlear implant users.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Preliminary evaluation of the FastCAP for users of the Nurotron cochlear implant.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Comparison of response properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve reported in human listeners and in animal models.Hearing research · 2022Review
- A Prospective, Multicentre Case-Control Trial Examining Factors That Explain Variable Clinical Performance in Post Lingual Adult CI Recipients.Trends in hearingArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This study demonstrated the effects of using different quantification methods and parameter scales on the sensitivity of the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) to changes in the interphase gap (IPG). The IPG effect measured in two groups of cochlear implant (CI) users with different cochlear nerve (CN) health on seven eCAP measures was quantified using an absolute and a proportional difference method. The IPG effect provides an indicator for the functional status of the CN in human CI users. Specifying how the IPG effect is quantified is critical for accurate result interpretation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.