Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35156089›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2022

Use of a Brief Negotiation Interview in the emergency department to reduce high-risk alcohol use among older adults: A randomized trial.

Christina L Shenvi, Yushan Wang, Rishab Revankar, Jacline Phillips, Montika Bush, Kevin J Biese, Aileen Aylward, Gail D'Onofrio, Timothy F Platts-Mills

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christina L ShenviDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2944-8581
Yushan WangWake Forest School of Medicine Winston Salem North Carolina USA.
Rishab RevankarMt. Sinai Icahn School of Medicine New York City New York USA.
Jacline PhillipsWake Forest School of Medicine Winston Salem North Carolina USA.
Montika BushDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA.
Kevin J BieseDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA.
Aileen AylwardDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA.
Gail D'OnofrioDepartment of Emergency Medicine Yale School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA.
Timothy F Platts-MillsOphirex Inc Corte Madera California USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
UNC-CH Summer Research Training in Aging for Medical StudentsT35AG038047 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI JAN BUSBY-WHITEHEAD · 2010 to 2026
$1.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIA NIH HHS T35 AG038047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether a Brief Negotiation Interview (BNI) performed in the emergency department (ED) can reduce future rates of alcohol use among older adults who are high-risk drinkers.

methodsAdults aged 65 years and older in a single academic ED were screened for high-risk alcohol use based on the National Institute for Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism definition of >7 drinks per week or >3 drinks per occasion. Eligible individuals who were high-risk drinkers who passed a cognitive impairment screener and who consented to enrollment were randomly assigned to receive the BNI versus usual care. Outcomes were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months.  The primary outcome was the rate of high-risk alcohol use at 6 months.

resultsOf 2250 ED patients who were screened, 183 (8%) met the criteria for high-risk alcohol use. Of those, 98 (53%) patients met full criteria and consented to participation. Of the participants, 67% were men and 83% were non-Hispanic White. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome of high-risk alcohol use at 6 months between the BNI at 59.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 45.5%-76.8%) and the control at 49.1% (95% CI, 36.9%-65.2%). However, there was a significant time-effect reduction in alcohol consumption and rates of high-risk alcohol use for both groups.

conclusionAmong older adults who met the criteria for high-risk alcohol use, the BNI in the ED did not result in a reduction in high-risk alcohol use at 6 months, although both groups showed significant reductions after their ED visit. Further work is needed to determine the optimal setting and time to use the BNI to impact high-risk alcohol use in this population.

Indexed as

alcohol abuseBrief Negotiation Interviewgeriatric emergency medicinesubstance use

Identifiers

PMID35156089
PMCPMC8828696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.