Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35156069›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Microbe2022

Prevalence of nasopharyngeal

John D Hart, Lyson Samikwa, Harry Meleke, Sarah E Burr, Jen Cornick, Khumbo Kalua, Robin L Bailey

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Microbe, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Trends inOpen forum infectious diseases · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

John D HartClinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Lyson SamikwaMicrobiology Department, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi.
Harry MelekeMicrobiology Department, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi.
Sarah E BurrClinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Jen CornickInstitute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Khumbo KaluaDepartment of Surgery, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi.
Robin L BaileyClinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
University of Malawi · MWLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBBlantyre Institute for Community Ophthalmology · MWUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAzithromycin mass drug administration (MDA) could reduce child mortality. However, macrolide resistance, which has generally been reported to develop after whole-community MDA for trachoma control, is a concern, and it has less commonly been studied in the context of treating children to reduce mortality. Here, we report on macrolide resistance after biannual azithromycin MDA at the Malawi site of the MORDOR study.

methodsIn the MORDOR cluster-randomised trial in Malawi, 30 communities in Mangochi District were randomly selected. Communities were randomly assigned to receive azithromycin or placebo by simple randomisation without stratification. Children aged 1-59 months were administered azithromycin 20 mg/kg or placebo as an oral suspension biannually for a total of four treatments in 2015-17. 1200 children (40 children per community) were randomly selected for nasopharyngeal swabs at baseline, 12 months (6 months after the second treatment visit), and 24 months (6 months after the fourth treatment visit). Samples were processed to culture

findingsAt baseline, 3467 (76%) of 4541 eligible children in the azithromycin group and 3107 (72%) of 4308 eligible children in the placebo group were treated. 564 nasopharyngeal swabs were taken from the azithromycin group and 563 from the placebo group, with similar numbers of swabs taken at 12 months and 24 months. In both groups at baseline, carriage of

interpretationThese findings support previous evidence from trachoma MDA programmes and suggest that monitoring of macrolide resistance should remain a key component of azithromycin interventions for reducing child mortality.

fundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Indexed as

AzithromycinTrachomaAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansMacrolidesMalawiMass Drug AdministrationPrevalenceStreptococcus pneumoniaeAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinMacrolides

Identifiers

PMID35156069
PMCPMC8819720
OpenAlexW4205263748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.