Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35156048›Full record

ReviewCritical care explorations2022

Sleep Assessment in Critically Ill Adults: Established Methods and Emerging Strategies.

Gerald L Weinhouse, Eyal Kimchi, Paula Watson, John W Devlin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care explorations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Sleep physiology and critical illness: A narrative review.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sleep in the ICU - A complex challenge requiring multifactorial solutions.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Sleep during and following critical illness: A narrative review.World journal of critical care medicine · 2023
    Review
  9. Sleep and critical illness: a review.Frontiers in medicine · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gerald L WeinhouseDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Eyal KimchiDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Paula WatsonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
John W DevlinDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USNortheastern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sleep is a biological mandate with an integral role in optimizing functions that maintain psychological and physical health. During critical illness, however, sleep may be disrupted at best and elusive at worst. Sleep improvement efforts and research endeavors evaluating interventions to improve sleep in critically ill adults are hampered by limited methods available to measure sleep in this setting. This narrative review summarizes available modalities for sleep assessment in the ICU, describes new ICU sleep assessment methods under development, and highlights features of the ideal ICU sleep measurement tool. DATA SOURCES: The most relevant literature and author experiences were assessed for inclusion from PubMed and textbooks. STUDY SELECTION: The authors selected studies for inclusion by consensus. DATA EXTRACTION: The authors reviewed each study and selected appropriate data for inclusion by consensus. DATA SYNTHESIS: Currently available tools to measure sleep in critically ill adults have important flaws. Subjective measurements are limited by recall bias, the inability of many patients to communicate, and poorly correlate with objective measures when completed by surrogates. Actigraphy does not consider the effects of sedating medications or myopathy leading to an over estimation of sleep time. Polysomnography, the gold standard for sleep assessment, is limited by interpretation issues and practical application concerns. Single and multiple channel electroencephalogram devices offer real-time physiologic data and are more practical to use than polysomnography but are limited by the scope of sleep-specific information they can measure and poorly characterize the circadian system.

conclusionsA measurement tool that offers real-time sleep and circadian assessment and is practical for broad application in the ICU does not exist. Newer sleep assessment devices have shown promise in measuring physiologic data in real time; when used in combination with other assessment modalities, and analyzed by computational techniques, they may revolutionize sleep monitoring in the ICU.

Indexed as

actigraphyassessmentelectroencephalographyintensive carepolysomnographysleep

Identifiers

PMID35156048
PMCPMC8824402
OpenAlexW4210938730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.