Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35156035›Full record

ReviewJAC-antimicrobial resistance2022

The feasibility and generalizability of assessing the appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing in hospitals: a review of the Australian National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey.

Rodney James, Yoshiko Nakamachi, Andrew Morris, Miranda So, Sasheela Sri La Sri Ponnampalavanar, Pem Chuki, Ly Sia Loong, Pauline Siew Mei Lai, Caroline Chen, Robyn Ingram and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Antimicrobial stewardship initiative on prescribing at discharge from a community medical center.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025
    Article
  11. A machine learning model to predict optimal antibiotic use in hospital medicine patients.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Rodney JamesNational Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, 792 Elizabeth Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1425-029X
Yoshiko NakamachiSinai Health-University Health Network Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, Toronto General Hospital, 585 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2N2, Canada.
Andrew MorrisSinai Health-University Health Network Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, Toronto General Hospital, 585 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2N2, Canada.
Miranda SoSinai Health-University Health Network Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, Toronto General Hospital, 585 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2N2, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2765-2063
Sasheela Sri La Sri PonnampalavanarUniversity Malaya Medical Centre, Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur 59100, Malaysia.
Pem ChukiJigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital, Gongphel Lam, Thimphu, Bhutan.
Ly Sia LoongUniversity Malaya Medical Centre, Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur 59100, Malaysia.
Pauline Siew Mei LaiUniversity Malaya Medical Centre, Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur 59100, Malaysia.
Caroline ChenNational Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, 792 Elizabeth Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia.
Robyn IngramNational Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, 792 Elizabeth Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia.
Arjun RajkhowaNational Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, 792 Elizabeth Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia.
Kirsty BuisingNational Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, 792 Elizabeth Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia.
Karin ThurskyNational Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, 792 Elizabeth Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7400-232X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (NAPS) is a web-based qualitative auditing platform that provides a standardized and validated tool to assist hospitals in assessing the appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing practices. Since its release in 2013, the NAPS has been adopted by all hospital types within Australia, including public and private facilities, and supports them in meeting the national standards for accreditation. Hospitals can generate real-time reports to assist with local antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) activities and interventions. De-identified aggregate data from the NAPS are also submitted to the Antimicrobial Use and Resistance in Australia surveillance system, for national reporting purposes, and to strengthen national AMS strategies. With the successful implementation of the programme within Australia, the NAPS has now been adopted by countries with both well-resourced and resource-limited healthcare systems. We provide here a narrative review describing the experience of users utilizing the NAPS programme in Canada, Malaysia and Bhutan. We highlight the key barriers and facilitators to implementation and demonstrate that the NAPS methodology is feasible, generalizable and translatable to various settings and able to assist in initiatives to optimize the use of antimicrobials.

Identifiers

PMID35156035
PMCPMC8827555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.