Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35156034›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2022

Evolution of cefiderocol resistance in

Brian J Werth, Nathaniel K Ashford, Kelsi Penewit, Adam Waalkes, Elizabeth A Holmes, Andrew Bryan, Stephen J Salipante

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cefiderocol-ResistantCase reports in infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Infection and immunity · 2023
    Article
  20. Clinical challenges treatingJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brian J WerthDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6751-4098
Nathaniel K AshfordDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kelsi PenewitDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Adam WaalkesDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Elizabeth A HolmesDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Andrew BryanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Stephen J SalipanteDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin active against MDR Gram-negatives including

methodsWe selected cefiderocol resistance in three clinical strains of

resultsEach parent strain was initially susceptible to cefiderocol (MICs of 0.03125, 0.03125 and 0.125 mg/L), and one initially tested susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam (MIC 4 mg/L). We recovered evolved isolates achieving cefiderocol resistance at MICs of 8-32 mg/L from each parental strain. Some cefiderocol resistant isolates reverted following one to four drug-free passages. Ceftazidime/avibactam MICs of passaged isolates repeatedly increased to ≥256 mg/L, and while other MICs were largely unchanged, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole MICs declined 4-fold in two strains. WGS revealed one evolved isolate carrying six coding mutations, while four were isogenic mutants of

conclusions

Identifiers

PMID35156034
PMCPMC8827560
OpenAlexW4210435982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.