Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35155789›Full record

ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2022

Introduction of a novel telescopic pathway to streamline 2-week-wait suspected head and neck cancer referrals and improve efficiency: A prospective service evaluation.

Christopher Metcalfe, Mehmet Dogan, Nina Glazzard, Elizabeth Ross, Ajith George

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Implementation of the Symptom Based Risk Calculator for Head and Neck Cancer HaNC-RC v.2 Post COVID-19 Pandemic. A Single Centre Audit.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  7. A retrospective cohort study of telephone versus face-to-face clinics for the management of new otology referrals.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher MetcalfeDepartment of Otolaryngology, Royal Stoke University Hospital University Hospitals North Midlands Stoke-on-Trent United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8790-2722
Mehmet DoganDepartment of Otolaryngology, Royal Stoke University Hospital University Hospitals North Midlands Stoke-on-Trent United Kingdom.
Nina GlazzardDepartment of Otolaryngology, Royal Stoke University Hospital University Hospitals North Midlands Stoke-on-Trent United Kingdom.
Elizabeth RossDepartment of Otolaryngology, Royal Stoke University Hospital University Hospitals North Midlands Stoke-on-Trent United Kingdom.
Ajith GeorgeDepartment of Otolaryngology, Royal Stoke University Hospital University Hospitals North Midlands Stoke-on-Trent United Kingdom.
Royal Stoke University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study summarizes the introduction of a novel telescopic pathway, which streamlines 2-week-wait suspected head and neck cancer referrals to our unit, describes the logistics of the pathway, and analyzes referral numbers and outcomes. We also discuss wider issues surrounding remote assessment in head and neck cancer.

methodsData were collected prospectively between January and May 2021, capturing all 2-week-wait referrals to our unit following the introduction of a telescopic pathway which utilized a nurse-led clinic for nasendoscopic examination of selected patients and consultant-led remote assessment using store and forward technology. Information on referral numbers, waiting times and outcomes was recorded.

resultsThree hundred and forty (185 high risk, 155 low risk) patients entered the telescopic pathway with the remaining 74 patients seen on the conventional standard of care pathway. Cancer conversion rates were 17%, <1%, and 5.4% for the high-risk telescopic, low-risk telescopic and standard of care pathways respectively. No patients discharged from the telescopic pathway were re-referred within 3 months. Review capacity for endoscopic examination was higher per consultant on the telescopic pathway versus the standard of care (

conclusionA combination of risk stratification and asynchronous telescopic assessment shows promise for the management of suspected head and neck cancer referrals. Potential benefits include consultant-led care for all patients and enhanced documentation. Digital communication with patients may also assist with adherence to the new NHS 28-day diagnostic standard for cancer referrals. Ongoing data collection is required to assess how the pathway functions over a longer period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2c.

Indexed as

COVID19head and neck cancertechnologytelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35155789
PMCPMC8823166
OpenAlexW4200252377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.