Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35155786›Full record

ReviewLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2022

Head and neck cancer survivorship consensus statement from the American Head and Neck Society.

Neerav Goyal, Andrew Day, Joel Epstein, Joseph Goodman, Evan Graboyes, Scharukh Jalisi, Ana P Kiess, Jamie A Ku, Matthew C Miller, Aru Panwar and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Lymphedema management in patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials on physical therapy interventions.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Upfront Neck Dissection for Treatment Selection and Improvement in Quality of Life as a Novel Treatment Paradigm for Deintensification in HPV+ OPSCC.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Network analysis of head and neck symptoms and fear of cancer recurrence in postoperative laryngeal cancer patients: simulation-based intervention modeling.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Barriers and facilitators of physical activity in patients with oral cancer during surgical hospitalization: insights from a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Long-term follow-up study on nutritional problems and health-related quality of life among head and neck cancer survivors more than 5 years after diagnosis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Patients' experiences of dysphagia and rehabilitation care needs across the pre-, intra-, and post-radiotherapy phases for head and neck cancer: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Neerav GoyalDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine Hershey Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7783-1097
Andrew DayDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7187-4125
Joel EpsteinDepartment of Surgery Cedars Sinai Los Angeles California USA.
Joseph GoodmanEar, Nose and Throat Center George Washington University Washington District of Columbia USA.
Evan GraboyesDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3766-468X
Scharukh JalisiDepartment of Otolaryngology Beth Israel Deaconess Boston Massachusetts USA.
Ana P KiessDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences Johns Hopkins Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA.
Jamie A KuHead and Neck Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA.
Matthew C MillerDepartment of Otolaryngology University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester New York USA.
Aru PanwarDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Methodist Estabrook Cancer Center Nebraska Methodist Hospital Omaha Nebraska USA.
Vijay A PatelDepartment of Otolaryngology University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
Assuntina SaccoDepartment of Medical Oncology University of California San Diego La Jolla California USA.
Vlad SandulacheDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9205-385X
Amy M WilliamsDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Henry Ford Health System Detroit Michigan USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9643-3684
Daniel DeschlerDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Massachusetts Eye and Ear Boston Massachusetts USA.
D Gregory FarwellDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of California Davis Davis California USA.
Cherie-Ann NathanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Louisiana State University Shreveport Louisiana USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7386-318X
Carole FakhryDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA.
Nishant AgrawalDepartment of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine Chicago Illinois USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo provide a consensus statement describing best practices and evidence regarding head and neck cancer survivorship.

methodsKey topics regarding head and neck cancer survivorship were identified by the multidisciplinary membership of the American Head and Neck Society Survivorship, Supportive Care & Rehabilitation Service. Guidelines were generated by combining expert opinion and a review of the literature and categorized by level of evidence.

resultsSeveral areas regarding survivorship including dysphonia, dysphagia, fatigue, chronic pain, intimacy, the ability to return to work, financial toxicity, lymphedema, psycho-oncology, physical activity, and substance abuse were identified and discussed. Additionally, the group identified and described the role of key clinicians in survivorship including surgical, medical and radiation oncologists; dentists; primary care physicians; psychotherapists; as well as physical, occupational, speech, and respiratory therapists.

conclusionHead and neck cancer survivorship is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach centered around patients and their caregivers. As survival related to head and neck cancer treatment improves, addressing post-treatment concerns appropriately is critically important to our patient's quality of life. There continues to be a need to define effective and efficient programs that can coordinate this multidisciplinary effort toward survivorship.

Indexed as

consensus statementhead and neck cancersurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID35155786
PMCPMC8823162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.