Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35155642›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2021

The Evidence for a Causal Link Between Disease and Damaging Behavior in Pigs.

Laura A Boyle, Sandra A Edwards, J Elizabeth Bolhuis, Françoise Pol, Manja Zupan Šemrov, Sabine Schütze, Janicke Nordgreen, Nadya Bozakova, Evangelia N Sossidou, Anna Valros

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Feeding of Undocked Pigs: Effects of Feed Components and Feed Composition.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Relevance of state-behaviour feedbacks for animal welfare.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Assessing and Improving Animal Welfare Using Applied Ethology.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 8 countries.

Laura A BoyleTeagasc Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Cork, Ireland.
Sandra A EdwardsSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
J Elizabeth BolhuisAdaptation Physiology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Françoise PolONIRIS, Nantes, France.
Manja Zupan ŠemrovBiotechnical Faculty, Department of Animal Science, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Sabine SchützeChamber of Agriculture of North Rhine-Westphalia, Animal Health Services, Bad Sassendorf, Germany.
Janicke NordgreenFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Paraclinical Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Nadya BozakovaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Trakia University, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria.
Evangelia N SossidouEllinikos Georgikos Organismos-DIMITRA (ELGO-DIMITRA), Veterinary Research Institute, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Anna ValrosDepartment of Production Animal Medicine, Research Centre for Animal Welfare, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Newcastle University · GBNorwegian University of Life Sciences · NOOniris · FRTeagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IETrakia University · BGUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Ljubljana · SIWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Damaging behaviors (DB) such as tail and ear biting are prevalent in pig production and reduce welfare and performance. Anecdotal reports suggest that health challenges increase the risk of tail-biting. The prevalence of tail damage and health problems show high correlations across batches within and between farms. There are many common risk factors for tail-biting and health problems, notably respiratory, enteric and locomotory diseases. These include suboptimal thermal climate, hygiene, stocking density and feed quality. The prevalence of tail damage and health problems also show high correlations across batches within and between farms. However, limited evidence supports two likely causal mechanisms for a direct link between DB and health problems. The first is that generalized poor health (e.g., enzootic pneumonia) on farm poses an increased risk of pigs performing DB. Recent studies indicate a possible causal link between an experimental inflammation and an increase in DB, and suggest a link between cytokines and tail-biting. The negative effects of poor health on the ingestion and processing of nutrients means that immune-stimulated pigs may develop specific nutrient deficiencies, increasing DB. The second causal mechanism involves tail-biting causing poor health. Indirectly, pathogens enter the body via the tail lesion and once infected, systemic spread of infection may occur. This occurs mainly via the venous route targeting the lungs, and to a lesser extent via cerebrospinal fluid and the lymphatic system. In carcasses with tail lesions, there is an increase in lung lesions, abscessation, arthritis and osteomyelitis. There is also evidence for the direct spread of pathogens between biters and victims. In summary, the literature supports the association between poor health and DB, particularly tail-biting. However, there is insufficient evidence to confirm causality in either direction. Nevertheless, the limited evidence is compelling enough to suggest that improvements to management and housing to enhance pig health will reduce DB. In the same way, improvements to housing and management designed to address DB, are likely to result in benefits to pig health. While most of the available literature relates to tail-biting, we suggest that similar mechanisms are responsible for links between health and other DB.

Indexed as

behaviorhealthlesionpigrisktail bitingwelfare

Identifiers

PMID35155642
PMCPMC8828939
OpenAlexW4210460525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.