Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35155637›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Generalizable Framework for Atrial Volume Estimation for Cardiac CT Images Using Deep Learning With Quality Control Assessment.

Musa Abdulkareem, Mark S Brahier, Fengwei Zou, Alexandra Taylor, Athanasios Thomaides, Peter J Bergquist, Monvadi B Srichai, Aaron M Lee, Jose D Vargas, Steffen E Petersen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Left atrial appendage morphofunctional indices could be predictive of arrhythmia recurrence post-atrial fibrillation ablation: a meta-analysis.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Musa AbdulkareemBarts Heart Centre, Barts Health National Health Service Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Mark S BrahierGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States.
Fengwei ZouMontefiore Medical Centre, Bronx, NY, United States.
Alexandra TaylorNortheastern University, Boston, MA, United States.
Athanasios ThomaidesMedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, Washington, DC, United States.
Peter J BergquistMedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, Washington, DC, United States.
Monvadi B SrichaiMedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, Washington, DC, United States.
Aaron M LeeBarts Heart Centre, Barts Health National Health Service Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Jose D VargasVeterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States.
Steffen E PetersenBarts Heart Centre, Barts Health National Health Service Trust, London, United Kingdom.
MedStar Heart & Vascular Institute · USGeorgetown University · USHealth Data Research UK · GBMontefiore Medical Center · USNortheastern University · USQueen Mary University of London · GBThe Alan Turing Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCardiac computed tomography (CCT) is a common pre-operative imaging modality to evaluate pulmonary vein anatomy and left atrial appendage thrombus in patients undergoing catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). These images also allow for full volumetric left atrium (LA) measurement for recurrence risk stratification, as larger LA volume (LAV) is associated with higher recurrence rates. Our objective is to apply deep learning (DL) techniques to fully automate the computation of LAV and assess the quality of the computed LAV values.

methodsUsing a dataset of 85,477 CCT images from 337 patients, we proposed a framework that consists of several processes that perform a combination of tasks including the selection of images with LA from all other images using a ResNet50 classification model, the segmentation of images with LA using a UNet image segmentation model, the assessment of the quality of the image segmentation task, the estimation of LAV, and quality control (QC) assessment.

resultsOverall, the proposed LAV estimation framework achieved accuracies of 98% (precision, recall, and F1 score metrics) in the image classification task, 88.5% (mean dice score) in the image segmentation task, 82% (mean dice score) in the segmentation quality prediction task, and

conclusionsWe proposed a generalizable framework that consists of DL models and computational methods for LAV estimation. The framework provides an efficient and robust strategy for QC assessment of the accuracy for DL-based image segmentation and volume estimation tasks, allowing high-throughput extraction of reproducible LAV measurements to be possible.

Indexed as

CTdeep learningleft atrial volumeleft atriumquality control

Identifiers

PMID35155637
PMCPMC8831539
OpenAlexW4210741712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.