ReviewFrontiers in public health2021
A Visualized and Scientometric Analysis of Health Literacy Research.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perception of fall risk among cancer survivors receiving Radiotherapy/Chemotherapy in China: A latent profile analysis.PloS one · 2026Article
- Health Literacy in People with Type 1 Diabetes: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Decomposition and Comparative Analysis of Urban-Rural Disparities in eHealth Literacy Among Chinese University Students: Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Mapping the research landscape of artificial hearts: identifying hotspots and frontiers through bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Sarcopenia in liver transplantation: A comprehensive bibliometric study of current research trends and future directions.Open life sciences · 2025Article
- A visualized and bibliometric analysis of nursing research during the COVID-19 pandemic.Medicine · 2024Article
- Knowledge structure and global trends of machine learning in stroke over the past decade: A scientometric analysis.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Advancing application of satellite remote sensing technologies for linking atmospheric and built environment to health.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- Health literacy strengths and challenges among residents of a resource-poor village in rural India: Epidemiological and cluster analyses.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The health literacy concerned by numerous policy and advocacy organizations is springing up rapidly and has evolved substantially over the past few decades. During the period of COVID-19, people who are in the absence of effective treatment and limited availability of vaccination need a higher health literacy to protective themselves. In order to provide a summary of the health literacy research, a visualized and Scientometric analysis is applied in this study. Methods: Based on a scientific review of 3,670 data on health literacy from Web of Science, this research uses Citespace software to systematically and objectively describe health literacy to determine the knowledge evolution structure between articles and investigate research trends. Results: The results show that the annual outputs of publications have grown rapidly since 2003. The USA and Australia make larger contributions compared with other countries in terms of quantity of publications and worldwide collaboration relationship between them. The "Soc Sci Med," "J Health Commun." "Patient Educ Couns" and "J Gen Intern Med" pay more attention to health literacy research. The leading authors with influence and authority are Wolf MS, Osborne RH, and Paasche-Orlow MK. Health literacy research in this field focuses on care, knowledge, and education, and so on. An emerging trend of health literacy with Covid-19, online tools, nursing, and obesity will spread across the globe. Conclusion: Compared with simply reviewing existing articles, the major contribution in this study is a comprehensive review of yearly scientific output, journals, countries, institutions, contributors, highly cited papers, and keywords for health literacy research. The review also provides valuable and seminal guidelines for interested researchers on health literacy research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.