Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35155267›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

The View Outside of the Box: Reporting Outcomes Following Radical Cystectomy Using Pentafecta From a Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.

Łukasz Zapała, Aleksander Ślusarczyk, Bartłomiej Korczak, Paweł Kurzyna, Mikołaj Leki, Piotr Lipiński, Jerzy Miłow, Michał Niemczyk, Kamil Pocheć, Michał Późniak and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Łukasz ZapałaClinic of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Aleksander ŚlusarczykClinic of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Bartłomiej KorczakDepartment of Urology, Regional Specialist Hospital, Kielce, Poland.
Paweł KurzynaClinic of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Mikołaj Leki2nd Clinic of Urology, Medical University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland.
Piotr Lipiński2nd Clinic of Urology, Medical University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland.
Jerzy Miłow2nd Clinic of Urology, Medical University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland.
Michał NiemczykClinic of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Kamil PochećDepartment of Urology, Regional Specialist Hospital, Kielce, Poland.
Michał PóźniakClinic of Urology, University Hospital No. 1, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Maciej PrzudzikDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.
Tomasz SuchojadDepartment of Urology, Regional Specialist Hospital, Kielce, Poland.
Rafał WolańskiClinic of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr ZapałaClinic of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Tomasz DrewaClinic of Urology, University Hospital No. 1, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Marek RoslanDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.
Waldemar Różański2nd Clinic of Urology, Medical University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland.
Andrzej Wróbel2nd Clinic of Gynecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Piotr RadziszewskiClinic of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed at characterization of the patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) using the prognostic model (a modified pentafecta). In the multicenter retrospective study, we enrolled 304 patients with bladder cancer (pTis-4N0-2M0) who underwent RC between 2015 and 2020 in experienced centers. The definition of the pentafecta was as follows: no Clavien-Dindo grade III-V complications at 90 days and no long-term complications related to urinary diversion <12 months, negative surgical margins, ≥10 lymph nodes (LNs) resected, and no recurrence ≤12 months. RC-pentafecta achievement rate was 22% (n = 67), varying from 47% to 88% attainment rate for different pentafecta components, and was the lowest for sufficient LN yield. Both 12-month recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific mortality were compromised in pentafecta failers compared with achievers (57.8% vs. 100% and 33.8% vs. 1.5%, respectively). The following were identified as crucial predictors of RC pentafecta achievement: modality of the surgery, type of urinary diversion, histological type of bladder cancer, advanced staging, and elevated preoperative serum creatinine. In conclusion, we found that the pentafecta achievement rate was low even in high-volume centers in patients undergoing cystectomy. The complexity of the procedure directly influenced the attainment rate, which in turn led to an increase in cancer-specific mortality rate among the pentafecta failers.

Indexed as

bladder cancermuscle-invasive bladder cancerpentafectaquality of cystectomyradical cystectomy

Identifiers

PMID35155267
PMCPMC8828538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.