Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35155084›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2022

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on vulnerable groups, including homeless persons and migrants, in France: A qualitative study.

Lisa Crouzet, Honor Scarlett, Anne-Claire Colleville, Lionel Pourtau, Maria Melchior, Simon Ducarroz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Fears and Hopes of Ukrainian Migrant Workers in Poland in the Pandemic Era.Journal of international migration and integration · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa CrouzetUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Research on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), INSERM U1290, Lyon, France.
Honor ScarlettSorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Département d'Epidémiologie Sociale, 27 rue de Chaligny, 75012 Paris, France.
Anne-Claire CollevilleSanté Publique France, 12 Rue du Val d'Osne Allée Vacassy, 94410 Saint-Maurice, France.
Lionel PourtauUniversité Paul Valery Montpellier 3, LEIRIS, Pôle Recherche & Innovation, Habitat & Humanisme, 69 chemin de Vassieux, 69300 Caluire et Cuire, France.
Maria MelchiorSorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Département d'Epidémiologie Sociale, 27 rue de Chaligny, 75012 Paris, France.
Simon DucarrozSorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Département d'Epidémiologie Sociale, 27 rue de Chaligny, 75012 Paris, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire sur les Enjeux Sociaux · FRSanté Publique France · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social inequalities tended to increase in the context of the pandemic, particularly in relation to the measures taken to manage and reduce the risk of COVID-19. When lockdown measures required the general population "to stay home", what were homeless people expected to do? The ECHO study is a cross-sectional, descriptive study with a convergent mixed-method design. Data were collected across shelters in France both during and immediately following the lockdown (April - June 2020). This article presents the study's qualitative findings, with a focus on understanding both the experiences and perceptions among these populations of the measures taken to limit the COVID-19 infection. A total of 26 semi-directed individual interviews were conducted across seven shelters in both Lyon (42%) and Paris (58%). Data were analysed using thematic content analysis with partial blinded coding. Four key themes were identified: 1- Reactions to the introduction of lockdown: a sudden implementation reminiscent of prior violent or traumatic circumstances amongst participants, 2- Accommodation during lockdown: participants' conflicting visions of the shelter, 3- Influence of the media and public communication: an abundant flow of information impacting participant's wellbeing and representations on the pandemic, and 4- The individual impact of lockdown: perceived health and limitations to daily life activities. The most vulnerable populations have borne the heaviest burden during the pandemic. It is therefore crucial that we improve both the availability of information, and the health literacy of, all groups within the national population.

Indexed as

COVID-19HomelessLockdownMigrantsSocial health inequalities

Identifiers

PMID35155084
PMCPMC8824256
OpenAlexW4211089572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.