ArticleCureus2022
Evaluation of Diagnostic Utility of the Immunohistochemical Markers in the Accurate Diagnosis of Thyroid Neoplasms: A Retrospective Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Pakistan.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Case Report of Metastatic Primary Thyroid Sarcoma Evaluated byIndian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, IndiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine malignancy across the globe and is among the fastest-growing cancers worldwide. Thyroid tumors are divided into differentiated and non-differentiated, with each having further subtypes, with papillary carcinoma being the most common one. Immunohistochemical (IHC) markers' studies play a crucial role in the accurate diagnosis of thyroid neoplasms. To the best of our knowledge, this topic has been the least researched in Pakistan. Objectives This study was designed to determine the diagnostic utility of immunohistochemical markers in the diagnosis of thyroid cancers in correlation with histopathology as the gold standard. Methods This retrospective, single-center study was carried out on 124 patients with thyroid cancer treated at our institution. The type of cancer, patient gender, and immunohistochemical markers used in each patient were recorded, and the sensitivity and specificity of the markers used in each tumor case were calculated. Results The mean age of patients was found to be 48.5 ± 15.6 years; 56 (45.2%) of the patients were male and 68 (54.8%) were female. Out of the 124 patients, 75 (60.5%) had papillary, 19 (15.3%) had medullary, 16 (12.9%) had anaplastic, and eight (6.5%) had follicular carcinoma, while six (4.8%) had primary thyroid lymphoma. Thyroglobulin was found to be a reliable tumor marker in both papillary and follicular tumors. The cluster of differentiation56 (CD56) negativity was a useful double panel study along with thyroglobulin in the confirmation of papillary carcinomas. Tumor markers used in medullary carcinoma include calcitonin, chromogranin, and synaptophysin. Cytokeratin AE 1 and vimentin were found to be useful for anaplastic tumors, while Ki 67 was a reliable marker for primary thyroid lymphoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.