Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35154900›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2022

Disrupting Essentialism in Medical Genetics Education.

Gareth Gingell, Andrew D Bergemann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gareth GingellDepartment of Medical Education, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3755-5590
Andrew D BergemannDepartment of Medical Education, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0027-7662

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many traditional practices in medical genetics education need review to counteract messages of essentialism, or the belief in an underlying natural structure differentiating social categories. While genomics research increasingly disproves a genetic foundation for race, research from educational scholars demonstrates that current medical genetics instruction may actually reinforce racial bias in learners. In this monograph, we outline seven recommendations for medical educators to actively counteract essentialism, racial, and otherwise, in the genetics classroom. In particular, we emphasize the importance of engaging learners in nuanced discussions around stereotyping and its negative consequences for both accurate diagnoses and promoting health equity.

Indexed as

BiasEssentialismInclusive teachingMedical geneticsRacism

Identifiers

PMID35154900
PMCPMC8814072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.