Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35154897›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2022

A Spoonful of Eponyms Helps the Pathology Go Down: Using Food Eponyms and Visual Mnemonics in Preclinical Pathology Education.

Christina Seto, Vania Zayat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christina SetoKaweah Health, 400 W. Mineral King Ave, Visalia, CA 93292 USA.
Vania ZayatUniversity of Central Florida College of Medicine, 6850 Lake Nona Blvd, Orlando, FL 32827 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3725-0324

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food eponymophilia in medicine describes a phenomenon by which diseases or pathologies are named for food items, such as "oat cell carcinoma" or "coffee bean nucleus." Some argue that these metaphors enrich medical education by providing familiar analogies to communicate pathology that is otherwise difficult to describe. Others argue that these metaphors are esoteric, burdensome, culturally irrelevant, and outdated. Few studies have ever focused on the use of metaphors in medical education, and even fewer have focused particularly on pathology or food eponyms. We aim to investigate the use of food eponyms in undergraduate medical education, particularly in pathology education, at the University of Central Florida College of Medicine. We used an interactive learning module to objectively assess whether or not students learn and retain pathology knowledge better using food eponyms, and a post-module survey to assess student perception of the use of these visual mnemonics within pathology educational activities. Results suggest that students not only learn and retain pathology knowledge through this type of activity, but that they also find these eponyms and mnemonics useful as they prepare for their USMLE step 1 exam, clinical clerkship, and future practice. This study is the first of its kind to investigate the usefulness of food eponymophilia in medical education and suggests that students empirically benefit from the use of these memory aids and find this form of learning enjoyable. Preclinical pathology education should make use of these tools in an effort to make pathology as palatable as possible. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-021-01474-w.

Indexed as

Food eponymophiliaPathologyPathology educationPreclinical education

Identifiers

PMID35154897
PMCPMC8814165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.