Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35154846›Full record

ReviewJournal of analytical methods in chemistry2022

Advanced Solid-Phase Microextraction Techniques and Related Automation: A Review of Commercially Available Technologies.

Stefano Dugheri, Nicola Mucci, Giovanni Cappelli, Lucia Trevisani, Alessandro Bonari, Elisabetta Bucaletti, Donato Squillaci, Giulio Arcangeli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of analytical methods in chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Detection ofSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Vacuum-Assisted MonoTrapMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stefano DugheriIndustrial Hygiene and Toxicology Laboratory, University Hospital Careggi, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3078-7188
Nicola MucciDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0579-1035
Giovanni CappelliDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5623-1671
Lucia TrevisaniDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9245-0302
Alessandro BonariGeneral Laboratory, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9136-822X
Elisabetta BucalettiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Donato SquillaciDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8665-845X
Giulio ArcangeliDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0094-0399

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The solid-phase microextraction (SPME), invented by Pawliszyn in 1989, today has a renewed and growing use and interest in the scientific community with fourteen techniques currently available on the market. The miniaturization of traditional sample preparation devices fulfills the new request of an environmental friendly analytical chemistry. The recent upswing of these solid-phase microextraction technologies has brought new availability and range of robotic automation. The microextraction solutions propose today on the market can cover a wide variety of analytical fields and applications. This review reports on the state-of-the-art innovative solid-phase microextraction techniques, especially those used for chromatographic separation and mass-spectrometric detection, given the recent improvements in availability and range of automation techniques. The progressively implemented solid-phase microextraction techniques and related automated commercially available devices are classified and described to offer a valuable tool to summarize their potential combinations to face all the laboratories requirements in terms of analytical applications, robustness, sensitivity, and throughput.

Identifiers

PMID35154846
PMCPMC8837452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.