Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35154757›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2020

Ceftriaxone- and ceftazidime-resistant

Yvonne N Wekesa, Fatuma Namusoke, Musa Sekikubo, Dennis Wandera Mango, Freddie Bwanga

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Antibiotic resistance ofJournal of water and health · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pharmaceutics · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yvonne N WekesaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Fatuma NamusokeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Musa SekikuboDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Dennis Wandera MangoMBN Clinical Laboratories, Kampala, Uganda.
Freddie BwangaMBN Clinical Laboratories, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8898-0992
Makerere University · UGJoint Clinical Research Centre · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to determine the proportion and mechanism of resistance to ceftriaxone and ceftazidime among

methodsWound swabs from 109 caesarean section surgical site infections were cultured for pathogenic bacteria following standard microbiological procedures. The Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion technique was used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Methicillin-resistant

resultsA total of 118 pathogens were recovered from 93 (85%) of 109 surgical site infections swabs. Of the 118 pathogens, gram-negative bacteria were 69 (58.5%), including 44 (37.3%)

conclusion

Indexed as

Caesarean sectionextended-spectrum beta-lactamasemethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)surgical site infections

Identifiers

PMID35154757
PMCPMC8826261
OpenAlexW3105018290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.