Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35154658›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2022

Evolutionary analyses of visual opsin genes in frogs and toads: Diversity, duplication, and positive selection.

Ryan K Schott, Leah Perez, Matthew A Kwiatkowski, Vance Imhoff, Jennifer M Gumm

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ryan K SchottDepartment of Biology York University Toronto Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4015-3955
Leah PerezDepartment of Biology Stephen F. Austin State University Nacogdoches Texas USA.
Matthew A KwiatkowskiDepartment of Biology Stephen F. Austin State University Nacogdoches Texas USA.
Vance ImhoffSouthern Nevada Fish and Wildlife Office US Fish and Wildlife Service Las Vegas Nevada USA.
Jennifer M GummDepartment of Biology Stephen F. Austin State University Nacogdoches Texas USA.
Stephen F. Austin State University · USUnited States Fish and Wildlife Service · USSmithsonian Institution · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among major vertebrate groups, anurans (frogs and toads) are understudied with regard to their visual systems, and little is known about variation among species that differ in ecology. We sampled North American anurans representing diverse evolutionary and life histories that likely possess visual systems adapted to meet different ecological needs. Using standard molecular techniques, visual opsin genes, which encode the protein component of visual pigments, were obtained from anuran retinas. Additionally, we extracted the visual opsins from publicly available genome and transcriptome assemblies, further increasing the phylogenetic and ecological diversity of our dataset to 33 species in total. We found that anurans consistently express four visual opsin genes (

Indexed as

amphibiancodon‐based likelihood modelsphotoreceptorsensory biologyspectral tuningvisual pigments

Identifiers

PMID35154658
PMCPMC8820127
OpenAlexW4210897938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.