Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35154651›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2022

Non-invasive monitoring of multiple wildlife health factors by fecal microbiome analysis.

Samuel B Pannoni, Kelly M Proffitt, William E Holben

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Insights into the Gut Microbial Diversity of Wild Siberian Musk Deer (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samuel B PannoniFranke College of Forestry and Conservation University of Montana Missoula Montana USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4456-4839
Kelly M ProffittMontana Fish Wildlife and Parks Bozeman Montana USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5528-3309
William E HolbenCellular, Molecular and Microbial Biology Program University of Montana Missoula Montana USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fecal microbial biomarkers represent a less invasive alternative for acquiring information on wildlife populations than many traditional sampling methodologies. Our goal was to evaluate linkages between fecal microbiome communities in Rocky Mountain elk (

Indexed as

16S‐rRNA surveyconservationhost‐microbiomemachine‐learningmicrobial‐biogeographynon‐invasivewildlife

Identifiers

PMID35154651
PMCPMC8826075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.