Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35154548›Full record

ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2022

Comparison of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, and tacrolimus as first steroid-sparing agents for complicated relapsing/steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome in children: an evaluation of the health-related quality of life.

Li Wang, Jialiang Zhu, Mingyun Xia, Ran Hua, Fang Deng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Li WangChildren's Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui, China.
Jialiang ZhuChildren's Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui, China.
Mingyun XiaChildren's Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui, China.
Ran HuaThe First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui, China.
Fang DengChildren's Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui, China.
Anhui Medical University · CNAnhui Provincial Children's Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFrequently-relapsing/steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (FRSDNS) leads to steroid toxicity impairing quality of life (QOL), thus prompting the use of steroid-sparing drugs.

methods51 FRSDNS children not previously treated with steroid-sparing agents were randomized to receive rituximab, cyclophosphamide, or tacrolimus. Clinical findings and QOL were evaluated before and after treatment.

resultsThe mean relapse rate in all groups declined six months after treatment, however, 1-year relapse-free survival rate, number of relapses, and cumulative prednisolone dosage were lower with rituximab than with tacrolimus and cyclophosphamide. Cyclophosphamide group had twice frequency of infections compared to the other groups. At 1 year after treatment, total scores showed greater improvement with rituximab.

conclusionsAs first-line steroid-sparing agent, rituximab is more effective and safer than cyclophosphamide and tacrolimus in FRSDNS, and improve QOL.

Indexed as

cyclophosphamidefrequently relapsing/steroid-dependent nephrotic syndromequality of liferituximabtacrolimus

Identifiers

PMID35154548
PMCPMC8826811
OpenAlexW4210266459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.