Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35154503›Full record

ArticleSocial network analysis and mining2022

Social media analytics system for action inspection on social networks.

Marco Mameli, Marina Paolanti, Christian Morbidoni, Emanuele Frontoni, Antonio Teti

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social network analysis and mining, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marco MameliVRAI Vision Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Department of Information Engineering (DII), Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, Ancona, Italy.
Marina PaolantiVRAI Vision Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Department of Information Engineering (DII), Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5523-7174
Christian MorbidoniUniversità degli Studi "G. d'Annunzio" Chieti, Pescara, Italy.
Emanuele FrontoniVRAI Vision Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Department of Information Engineering (DII), Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, Ancona, Italy.
Antonio TetiUniversità degli Studi "G. d'Annunzio" Chieti, Pescara, Italy.
Marche Polytechnic University · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social networks are increasingly used for discussing all kinds of topics, including those related to politics, serving as a virtual arena. Consequently, analysing online conversations, for example, to predict election outcomes, is becoming a popular and challenging research area. On social networking sites, citizens express themselves spontaneously regarding political topics, often driven by specific events in social life. Real-time analysis of social media can provide valuable feedback and insights to both politicians and news agencies. In this paper, we discuss the design and implementation of a system for tracking and analysing social media. The SocMINT system provides an easy-to-use, visual dashboard to monitor the discussion on specific topics, to capture trends in communities and, by iteratively applying multidimensional data analysis and filtering, to deeply analyse posts and influencers. SocMINT aggregates data from multiple social sources and performs sentiment analysis on textual, visual and mixed content via a specifically designed neural network architecture. The system was applied in a real context by administrative staff of a political party to effectively analyse candidates' political communication on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter and the related online community reactions and discussion. In the paper, we report on this real-world case study, showing how the system meaningfully captures trends in public opinion, comparing the main KPIs provided by SocMINT with the outcomes of traditional polls.

Indexed as

Data visualisationDeep learningSentiment analysisSocial decision support systemSocial media

Identifiers

PMID35154503
PMCPMC8818504
OpenAlexW4210633395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.