Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35154443›Full record

ArticleJournal of Cancer2022

Liquid Biopsy and Tissue Biopsy Comparison with Digital PCR and IHC/FISH for HER2 Amplification Detection in Breast Cancer Patients.

Suhong Xie, Yan Wang, Zhiyun Gong, Yuan Li, Wentao Yang, Guangyu Liu, Jianwei Li, Xin Hu, Yanchun Wang, Yin Tong and 13 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05942066 (Feasibility Study Aiming at Pre-Analytical Standardization of Whole Blood Processing for Liquid Biopsy Applications), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05942066 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility Study Aiming at Pre-Analytical Standardization of Whole Blood Processing for Liquid Biopsy Applications

TypeobservationalSponsorTethis S.p.A.Ran2023 to 2027Enrolled200ConditionsHealthy Participants
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Impact of Concordance between Liquid and Tissue Biopsy for Actionable Mutations: Insights from the ROME Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suhong XieDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Yan WangQuestgenomics, No.12 Mozhou East Rd, Nanjing, Jiangsu, P. R. China.
Zhiyun GongDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Yuan LiDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical School, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Wentao YangDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical School, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Guangyu LiuDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical School, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Jianwei LiDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical School, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Xin HuDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical School, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Yanchun WangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Yin TongDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Peng YuanDepartment of VIP Medical Services, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P. R. China.
Yiran SiDepartment of VIP Medical Services, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P. R. China.
Yikun KangDepartment of VIP Medical Services, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P. R. China.
Yong MaoDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, P. R. China.
Xiaowei QiDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, P. R. China.
Yankui LiuDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, P. R. China.
Jiajia OuQuestgenomics, No.12 Mozhou East Rd, Nanjing, Jiangsu, P. R. China.
Zhaoliang LiQuestgenomics, No.12 Mozhou East Rd, Nanjing, Jiangsu, P. R. China.
Xin PanQuestgenomics, No.12 Mozhou East Rd, Nanjing, Jiangsu, P. R. China.
Zhaoqing LvQuestgenomics, No.12 Mozhou East Rd, Nanjing, Jiangsu, P. R. China.
Kavanaugh KajiGnomegen, 6440 Lusk Blvd, D207, San Diego, CA, 92121 United States.
Lin GuoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Renquan LuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two hundred twenty-four breast cancer patients with paired tissue and plasma samples were enrolled from 3 clinical centers to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of a digital PCR HER2 amplification assay. All patients were histologically confirmed diagnosis of locally advanced and recurrent or metastatic breast cancer with stage III/IV and had tissue HER2 status determinations using IHC/FISH. For the whole 224 advanced breast cancer patients, the sensitivity between dPCR in plasma and IHC/FISH in tissue samples is 43.75% (42/96), the specificity is 84.38% (108/128) and the overall concordance is 66.96% (150/224). Interestingly, when we looked at stage III, stage IV and recurrent or metastatic breast cancer separately, compared with IHC/FISH in tissue samples, the sensitivity of dPCR in plasma increases from 37.93% (11/29) for stage III to 41.67% (15/36) for stage IV cancer. Recurrent breast cancer patient had an increased sensitivity of 51.61% (16/31). This is consistent with our expectation sensitivity would increase concordantly as tumor burden goes up. On the other hand, specificity decreased from 92.68% (38/41) for stage III to 86.44% (51/59) for stage IV cancer. Recurrent breast cancer patient had a specificity of only 67.86% (19/28). This is, in part, due to inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. Many patients determined to be negative for HER2 amplification in tissue biopsy could have HER2 positive tumors at other sites, which was detected by the liquid biopsy. This study suggested the necessity of liquid biopsy for HER2 amplification detection and demonstrated digital PCR can be used as a companion diagnostic tool to determine HER2 amplification status. It also suggested that a liquid biopsy should follow a negative result from tissue biopsy to avoid false negative results especially for late-stage breast cancer patients and ones who experienced relapse or became resistant to current therapy. Future studies should focus on therapeutic effects on patients determined to be HER2 positive through liquid biopsy and collecting additional tissue biopsies to identify HER2 positive tumor when the original tissue biopsy and liquid biopsy don't agree.

Indexed as

digital PCRHER2liquid biopsysensitivitytissue biopsy

Identifiers

PMID35154443
PMCPMC8824896
OpenAlexW4210787350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.