Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35154399›Full record

ArticleShoulder & elbow2022

Effect of human dermal allograft thickness on glenohumeral stability for superior capsular reconstruction in irreparable supraspinatus tears: A biomechanical analysis of the superior capsular reconstruction - A cadaveric study.

Geoffrey Cs Smith, Heon Y Im, Patrick H Lam

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Shoulder & elbow, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Geoffrey Cs SmithUNSW, St George Clinical School, Sydney, Australia.
Heon Y ImUNSW, St George Clinical School, Sydney, Australia.
Patrick H LamUNSW, St George Clinical School, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6196-1794
St George Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe objective of this study was to compare the biomechanics of using a double layered human dermal allograft to a single layered human dermal allograft in superior capsular reconstruction.

methodsFive cadaveric shoulders were tested. The superior translation of the humerus and the subacromial contact pressure were measured at 0°, 30° and 60° of glenohumeral abduction in the following six conditions: (1) intact rotator cuff, (2) irreparable supraspinatus tear, (3) superior capsular reconstruction using a double layered human dermal allograft with and (4) without posterior suturing, (5) superior capsular reconstruction using a single human dermal allograft with and (6) without posterior suturing.

resultsThere was a significant increase in superior translation of the humerus and subacromial contact pressure when comparing torn supraspinatus to intact shoulder. All superior capsular reconstruction repairs lead to a reduction in superior translation and subacromial contact pressures compared to after the supraspinatus tear except for single layered superior capsular reconstruction repair without posterior suturing. There was no difference in superior translation and subacromial contact pressures comparing the intact shoulder to any of the superior capsular reconstruction constructs.

conclusionSuperior capsular reconstruction using a single or double layered human dermal allograft improves superior translation after supraspinatus repair. There is some biomechanical benefit of a double layered human dermal allograft technique over a single layered graft technique in superior capsular reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Indexed as

biomechanicsgraft thicknesshuman dermal allograftrotator cuff tearsuperior capsular reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID35154399
PMCPMC8832698
OpenAlexW3032142041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.