Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35154361›Full record

SynthesisComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022

Machine Learning-Based Automated Diagnostic Systems Developed for Heart Failure Prediction Using Different Types of Data Modalities: A Systematic Review and Future Directions.

Ashir Javeed, Shafqat Ullah Khan, Liaqat Ali, Sardar Ali, Yakubu Imrana, Atiqur Rahman

RetractedOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
18.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Ashir JaveedAging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
Shafqat Ullah KhanDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Bannu, Pakistan.
Liaqat AliDepartment of Electronics, University of Buner, Buner, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3095-7271
Sardar AliSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Isra University Islamabad Campus, Pakistan.
Yakubu ImranaSchool of Engineering, University of Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9901-4909
Atiqur RahmanDepartment of Computer Science, University of Science and Technology Bannu, Pakistan.
University of Science and Technology Bannu · PKIsra University · PKKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the leading causes of deaths around the globe is heart disease. Heart is an organ that is responsible for the supply of blood to each part of the body. Coronary artery disease (CAD) and chronic heart failure (CHF) often lead to heart attack. Traditional medical procedures (angiography) for the diagnosis of heart disease have higher cost as well as serious health concerns. Therefore, researchers have developed various automated diagnostic systems based on machine learning (ML) and data mining techniques. ML-based automated diagnostic systems provide an affordable, efficient, and reliable solutions for heart disease detection. Various ML, data mining methods, and data modalities have been utilized in the past. Many previous review papers have presented systematic reviews based on one type of data modality. This study, therefore, targets systematic review of automated diagnosis for heart disease prediction based on different types of modalities, i.e., clinical feature-based data modality, images, and ECG. Moreover, this paper critically evaluates the previous methods and presents the limitations in these methods. Finally, the article provides some future research directions in the domain of automated heart disease detection based on machine learning and multiple of data modalities.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAlgorithmsArrhythmias, CardiacComputational BiologyCoronary Artery DiseaseDatabases, FactualData MiningDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedElectrocardiographyHeart FailureHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID35154361
PMCPMC8831075
OpenAlexW4212964221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.