ArticleBiomedical signal processing and control2022
Automated lung ultrasound scoring for evaluation of coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia using two-stage cascaded deep learning model.
Article in Biomedical signal processing and control, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated segmentation and classification of lumbar transverse ultrasound views using a two-stage deep learning method.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Article
- Deep Learning Network Selection and Optimized Information Fusion for Enhanced COVID-19 Detection: A Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The value of lung ultrasound score in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective diagnostic cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- A new classification method for diagnosing COVID-19 pneumonia based on joint CNN features of chest X-ray images and parallel pyramid MLP-mixer module.Neural computing & applications · 2023Article
- Diagnosis and Prognosis Evaluation of Severe Pneumonia by Lung Ultrasound Score Combined with Serum Inflammatory Markers.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2023Article
- An overview of deep learning techniques for COVID-19 detection: methods, challenges, and future works.Multimedia systems · 2023Article
- The role of ultrasound in predicting non-invasive ventilation outcomes: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Multiclass Classification for Detection of COVID-19 Infection in Chest X-Rays Using CNN.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia has erupted worldwide, causing massive population deaths and huge economic losses. In clinic, lung ultrasound (LUS) plays an important role in the auxiliary diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia. However, the lack of medical resources leads to the low using efficiency of the LUS, to address this problem, a novel automated LUS scoring system for evaluating COVID-19 pneumonia based on the two-stage cascaded deep learning model was proposed in this paper. 18,330 LUS images collected from 26 COVID-19 pneumonia patients were successfully assigned scores by two experienced doctors according to the designed four-level scoring standard for training the model. At the first stage, we made a secondary selection of these scored images through five ResNet-50 models and five-fold cross validation to obtain the available 12,949 LUS images which were highly relevant to the initial scoring results. At the second stage, three deep learning models including ResNet-50, Vgg-19, and GoogLeNet were formed the cascaded scored model and trained using the new dataset, whose predictive result was obtained by the voting mechanism. In addition, 1000 LUS images collected another 5 COVID-19 pneumonia patients were employed to test the model. Experiments results showed that the automated LUS scoring model was evaluated in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score, being 96.1%, 96.3%, 98.8%, and 96.1%, respectively. They proved the proposed two-stage cascaded deep learning model could automatically score an LUS image, which has great potential for application to the clinics on various occasions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.