ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022
SCClone: Accurate Clustering of Tumor Single-Cell DNA Sequencing Data.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- CluVar: clustering of variants using autoencoder for inferring cancer subclones from single cell RNA sequencing data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Role of intratumoral heterogeneity in metastatic progression and drug resistance.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Advances and applications in single-cell and spatial genomics.Science China. Life sciences · 2025Review
- A statistical learning method for simultaneous copy number estimation and subclone clustering with single-cell sequencing data.Genome research · 2024Article
- Assessing the performance of methods for cell clustering from single-cell DNA sequencing data.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- bmVAE: a variational autoencoder method for clustering single-cell mutation data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-cell DNA sequencing (scDNA-seq) enables high-resolution profiling of genetic diversity among single cells and is especially useful for deciphering the intra-tumor heterogeneity and evolutionary history of tumor. Specific technical issues such as allele dropout, false-positive errors, and doublets make scDNA-seq data incomplete and error-prone, giving rise to a severe challenge of accurately inferring clonal architecture of tumor. To effectively address these issues, we introduce a new computational method called SCClone for reasoning subclones from single nucleotide variation (SNV) data of single cells. Specifically, SCClone leverages a probability mixture model for binary data to cluster single cells into distinct subclones. To accurately decipher underlying clonal composition, a novel model selection scheme based on inter-cluster variance is employed to find the optimal number of subclones. Extensive evaluations on various simulated datasets suggest SCClone has strong robustness against different technical noises in scDNA-seq data and achieves better performance than the state-of-the-art methods in reasoning clonal composition. Further evaluations of SCClone on three real scDNA-seq datasets show that it can effectively find the underlying subclones from severely disturbed data. The SCClone software is freely available at https://github.com/qasimyu/scclone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.