ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021
A SNARE Protein Identification Method Based on iLearnPlus to Efficiently Solve the Data Imbalance Problem.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Deep Learning and PSSM Profile Approach for Accurate SNARE Protein Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Mechanisms of SNARE proteins in membrane fusion.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning has been widely used to solve complex problems in engineering applications and scientific fields, and many machine learning-based methods have achieved good results in different fields. SNAREs are key elements of membrane fusion and required for the fusion process of stable intermediates. They are also associated with the formation of some psychiatric disorders. This study processes the original sequence data with the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) to solve the problem of data imbalance and produces the most suitable machine learning model with the iLearnPlus platform for the identification of SNARE proteins. Ultimately, a sensitivity of 66.67%, specificity of 93.63%, accuracy of 91.33%, and MCC of 0.528 were obtained in the cross-validation dataset, and a sensitivity of 66.67%, specificity of 93.63%, accuracy of 91.33%, and MCC of 0.528 were obtained in the independent dataset (the adaptive skip dipeptide composition descriptor was used for feature extraction, and LightGBM with proper parameters was used as the classifier). These results demonstrate that this combination can perform well in the classification of SNARE proteins and is superior to other methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.