ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2021
Activity of
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Transcriptomic insights into the biocontrol mechanism of Trichoderma spp. against Fusarium wilt in melon.Stress biology · 2026Article
- Pomegranate Dieback in Italy: New Insights into the Etiology of the Disease.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effects of Trichoderma treatments on the phenolic and sensory quality of Aglianico grapes and wine.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026Article
- EngineeringAIMS microbiology · 2026Review
- Health Status and Disinfection Prior to Grafting Affect the Phenolic Profile of Grapevine Hetero-Grafts and Grafting Yield.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Nematocidal activity of fungal filtrates on eggs and juveniles of five species of sedentary endoparasitic nematodes.Journal of nematology · 2025Article
- Volatile Organic Compounds Produced byMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Microbial Biological Control of Fungi Associated with Grapevine Trunk Diseases: A Review of Strain Diversity, Modes of Action, and Advantages and Limits of Current Strategies.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Pruning Wound Protection Products Induce Alterations in the Wood Mycobiome Profile of Grapevines.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Susceptibility of pruning wounds to grapevine trunk diseases: A quantitative analysis of literature data.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Biological management of coffee wilt disease (Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Sodium arsenite-induced changes in the wood of esca-diseased grapevine at cytological and metabolomic levels.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Review
- The Biocontrol Potential of EndophyticPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Grapevine trunk diseases are widespread in all grape-growing countries. The diseases included in the Esca complex of diseases are particularly common in European vineyards. Their distinctive foliar symptoms are well known to be associated not only with losses in quantity, as with all grapevine wood diseases, but also with losses in the quality of the crop. Protection of pruning wounds is known to reduce infections in artificial inoculations and, to some extent, reduce the external leaf symptoms. The application of biological control agents in the field is typically started at the first appearance of symptoms. In this article, the two strains belonging to two different species,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.