Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35153995›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2021

Cutaneous Allodynia in Migraine: A Narrative Review.

Ane Mínguez-Olaondo, Sonia Quintas, Noemí Morollón Sánchez-Mateos, Alba López-Bravo, Marta Vila-Pueyo, Vesselina Grozeva, Robert Belvís, Sonia Santos-Lasaosa, Pablo Irimia

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Human assumed central sensitization in interictal migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. PVNAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Ane Mínguez-OlaondoNeurology Department, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain.
Sonia QuintasHospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Noemí Morollón Sánchez-MateosHeadache and Neuralgia Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Alba López-BravoHospital Reina Sofía, Tudela, Spain.
Marta Vila-PueyoHeadache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Department of Medicine, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Vesselina GrozevaPrivate Neurology Practice, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Robert BelvísHeadache and Neuralgia Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Sonia Santos-LasaosaInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain.
Pablo IrimiaClínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Hospital de Sant Pau · ESBiogipuzkoa Health Research Institute · ESClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESHospital Universitario de La Princesa · ESHospital Universitario Reina Sofía · ESInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn the present work, we conduct a narrative review of the most relevant literature on cutaneous allodynia (CA) in migraine.

backgroundCA is regarded as the perception of pain in response to non-noxious skin stimulation. The number of research studies relating to CA and migraine has increased strikingly over the last few decades. Therefore, the clinician treating migraine patients must recognize this common symptom and have up-to-date knowledge of its importance from the pathophysiological, diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic point of view.

methodsWe performed a comprehensive narrative review to analyze existing literature regarding CA in migraine, with a special focus on epidemiology, pathophysiology, assessment methods, risk for chronification, diagnosis and management. PubMed and the Cochrane databases were used for the literature search.

resultsThe prevalence of CA in patients with migraine is approximately 60%. The mechanisms underlying CA in migraine are not completely clarified but include a sensitization phenomenon at different levels of the trigemino-talamo-cortical nociceptive pathway and dysfunction of brainstem and cortical areas that modulate thalamocortical inputs. The gold standard for the assessment of CA is quantitative sensory testing (QST), but the validated Allodynia 12-item questionnaire is preferred in clinical setting. The presence of CA is associated with an increased risk of migraine chronification and has therapeutic implications.

conclusionsCA is a marker of central sensitization in patients with migraine that has been associated with an increased risk of chronification and may influence therapeutic decisions.

Indexed as

cutaneous allodyniamigrainemigraine chronificationrisk factorstreatment

Identifiers

PMID35153995
PMCPMC8830422
OpenAlexW4207056667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.