Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35153975›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2021

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing FAST and BEFAST in Acute Stroke Patients.

Xinjie Chen, Xiaoxiao Zhao, Fan Xu, Mingjin Guo, Yifan Yang, Lianmei Zhong, Xiechuan Weng, Xiaolei Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Examining Stroke Symptom Messages Implemented Globally: A Need for Contextually Relevant Stroke Symptom Messaging.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Prehospital notification in acute stroke: a retrospective cohort study.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Xinjie ChenDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dali University, Dali, China.
Xiaoxiao ZhaoDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Fan XuDepartment of Public Health, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China.
Mingjin GuoDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Yifan YangDepartment of Pain Medicine, Peking University Peoples Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lianmei ZhongDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Xiechuan WengDepartment of Neuroscience, Beijing Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiaolei LiuDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao University · CNChengdu Medical College · CNDali University · CNInstitute of Basic Medical Sciences of the Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesKunming Medical University · CNPeking University People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate and compare the predictive value of Face, Arm, Speech Test (FAST) and Balance, Eyes, Face, Arm, Speech, Time (BEFAST) scale in the acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

methodsWe searched Medline and Ovid databases for relevant literature in the English language. There were no limitations on the date. The sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were pooled for meta-analysis. The symmetric receiver operator characteristic curve and Fagan's Nomogram were drawn, and meta-regression and subgroup analysis were used to explore the source of heterogeneity.

resultsA total of 9 studies, including 6,151 participants, were analyzed. The combined sensitivity of FAST was 0.77 [95%

conclusionsOur findings indicated that FAST and BEFAST might be useful in the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke. The diagnostic value of BEFAST in acute ischemic stroke was higher than in FAST; thus, it might have an important role in the fast recognition of acute ischemic stroke.

Indexed as

acute strokeBEFASTFASTmeta-analysisstrokesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35153975
PMCPMC8837419
OpenAlexW4210442654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.