Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35153827›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2022

Detection and Localization of Myocardial Infarction Based on Multi-Scale ResNet and Attention Mechanism.

Yang Cao, Wenyan Liu, Shuang Zhang, Lisheng Xu, Baofeng Zhu, Huiying Cui, Ning Geng, Hongguang Han, Stephen E Greenwald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. [Automatic detection and visualization of myocardial infarction in electrocardiograms based on an interpretable deep learning model].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [A review on intelligent auxiliary diagnosis methods based on electrocardiograms for myocardial infarction].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yang CaoSchool of Intelligent Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Wenyan LiuCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Shuang ZhangCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Lisheng XuCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Baofeng ZhuNeusoft Research of Intelligent Healthcare Technology, Co., Ltd., Shenyang, China.
Huiying CuiCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Ning GengDepartment of Cardiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Hongguang HanDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
Stephen E GreenwaldBarts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMyocardial infarction (MI) is one of the most common cardiovascular diseases, frequently resulting in death. Early and accurate diagnosis is therefore important, and the electrocardiogram (ECG) is a simple and effective method for achieving this. However, it requires assessment by a specialist; so many recent works have focused on the automatic assessment of ECG signals.

methodsFor the detection and localization of MI, deep learning models have been proposed, but the diagnostic accuracy of this approaches still need to be improved. Moreover, with deep learning methods the way in which a given result was achieved lacks interpretability. In this study, ECG data was obtained from the PhysioBank open access database, and was analyzed as follows. Firstly, the 12-lead ECG signal was preprocessed to identify each beat and obtain each heart interval. Secondly, a multi-scale deep learning model combined with a residual network and attention mechanism was proposed, where the input was the 12-lead ECG recording. Through the SENet model and the Grad-CAM algorithm, the weighting of each lead was calculated and visualized. Using existing knowledge of the way in which different types of MI gave characteristic patterns in specific ECG leads, the model was used to provisionally diagnose the type of MI according to the characteristics of each of the 12 ECG leads.

resultsTen types of MI anterior, anterior lateral, anterior septal, inferior, inferior lateral, inferior posterior, inferior posterior lateral, lateral, posterior, and posterior lateral were diagnosed. The average accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for MI detection of all lesion types was 99.98, 99.94, and 99.98%, respectively; and the average accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for MI localization was 99.79, 99.88, and 99.98%, respectively.

conclusionWhen compared to existing models based on traditional machine learning methods, convolutional neural networks and recurrent neural networks, the results showed that the proposed model had better diagnostic performance, being superior in accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.

Indexed as

attention mechanismgradient class activation mappingmulti-lead ECGmyocardial infarctionresidual network

Identifiers

PMID35153827
PMCPMC8832050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.