Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35153767›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2021

A Review of Approaches for Predicting Drug-Drug Interactions Based on Machine Learning.

Ke Han, Peigang Cao, Yu Wang, Fang Xie, Jiaqi Ma, Mengyao Yu, Jianchun Wang, Yaoqun Xu, Yu Zhang, Jie Wan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. DDI-CYP: Metabolism ensemble models for drug-drug interaction predictions.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ke HanHeilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Electronic Commerce and Information Processing, School of Computer and Information Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, China.
Peigang CaoBeidahuang Industry Group General Hospital, Harbin, China.
Yu WangHeilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Electronic Commerce and Information Processing, School of Computer and Information Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, China.
Fang XieHeilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Electronic Commerce and Information Processing, School of Computer and Information Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, China.
Jiaqi MaHeilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Electronic Commerce and Information Processing, School of Computer and Information Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, China.
Mengyao YuHeilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Electronic Commerce and Information Processing, School of Computer and Information Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, China.
Jianchun WangHeilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Electronic Commerce and Information Processing, School of Computer and Information Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, China.
Yaoqun XuHeilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Electronic Commerce and Information Processing, School of Computer and Information Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, China.
Yu ZhangHeilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Electronic Commerce and Information Processing, School of Computer and Information Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, China.
Jie WanLaboratory for Space Environment and Physical Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug-drug interactions play a vital role in drug research. However, they may also cause adverse reactions in patients, with serious consequences. Manual detection of drug-drug interactions is time-consuming and expensive, so it is urgent to use computer methods to solve the problem. There are two ways for computers to identify drug interactions: one is to identify known drug interactions, and the other is to predict unknown drug interactions. In this paper, we review the research progress of machine learning in predicting unknown drug interactions. Among these methods, the literature-based method is special because it combines the extraction method of DDI and the prediction method of DDI. We first introduce the common databases, then briefly describe each method, and summarize the advantages and disadvantages of some prediction models. Finally, we discuss the challenges and prospects of machine learning methods in predicting drug interactions. This review aims to provide useful guidance for interested researchers to further promote bioinformatics algorithms to predict DDI.

Indexed as

drug-drug interactionsmachine learningnetwork diffusionpredictionsimilarity

Identifiers

PMID35153767
PMCPMC8835726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.