ReviewFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2021
Women in Neuroscience: Four Women's Contributions to Science and Society.
Review in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Editorial: Women in systems neuroscience.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
There has been increased cognizance of gender inequity and the importance of an inclusive and diverse approach to scientific research in recent years. However, the innovative work of women scientists is still undervalued based on reports of fewer women in leadership positions, limited citations of research spearheaded by women, reduced federal grant awards, and lack of recognition. Women have been involved in trailblazing work that paved the way for contemporary scientific inquiry. The strides made in current neuroscience include contributions from women who deserve more recognition. In this review, we discuss the work of four women whose groundbreaking scientific work has made ineffaceable marks in the neuroscience field. These women are pioneers of research and innovators and, in addition, contribute to positive change that bolsters the academic community and society. This article celebrates these women scientists, their substantial impacts in neuroscience, and the positive influence of their work on advancing society and culture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.