Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35153587›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2021

Bayesian uncertainty quantification for data-driven equation learning.

Simon Martina-Perez, Matthew J Simpson, Ruth E Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Simon Martina-PerezMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8596-8595
Matthew J SimpsonSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6254-313X
Ruth E BakerMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6304-9333

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R000816/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Equation learning aims to infer differential equation models from data. While a number of studies have shown that differential equation models can be successfully identified when the data are sufficiently detailed and corrupted with relatively small amounts of noise, the relationship between observation noise and uncertainty in the learned differential equation models remains unexplored. We demonstrate that for noisy datasets there exists great variation in both the structure of the learned differential equation models and their parameter values. We explore how to exploit multiple datasets to quantify uncertainty in the learned models, and at the same time draw mechanistic conclusions about the target differential equations. We showcase our results using simulation data from a relatively straightforward agent-based model (ABM) which has a well-characterized partial differential equation description that provides highly accurate predictions of averaged ABM behaviours in relevant regions of parameter space. Our approach combines equation learning methods with Bayesian inference approaches so that a quantification of uncertainty can be given by the posterior parameter distribution of the learned model.

Indexed as

equation learningmathematical modellinguncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID35153587
PMCPMC8548080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.