Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35153154›Full record

ArticleClinical genitourinary cancer2022

Assessing Inter-Fraction Changes in The Size and Position of The Penile Bulb During Daily MR-Guided Radiation Therapy to The Prostate Bed: Do We Need to Adjust How We Plan Radiation in The Post-Radical Prostatectomy Setting to Reduce Risk of Erectile Dysfunction?

Amit Roy, Olga Green, Randall Brenneman, Walter Bosch, Hiram A Gay, Jeff M Michalski, Brian C Baumann

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amit RoyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Olga GreenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Randall BrennemanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Walter BoschDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Hiram A GayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Jeff M MichalskiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Brian C BaumannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO. Electronic address: brian.baumann@wustl.edu.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY J. EBERLEIN · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe evaluated inter-fraction penile bulb (PB) changes in prostate cancer (PCa) patients undergoing MR-guided RT in the post-radical prostatectomy (RP) setting. MATERIALS AND

methods10 patients with PCa status-post RP received MR-guided RT from 2017-2019. Patients received daily setup volumetric MRI scans prior to RT delivery for alignment and target localization. Setup MRI datasets from Fx 1, Fx 19, and Fx 37 were fused for each patient based on soft tissue anatomy. The PB was contoured on each MRI. Data on volume (cc), superior/inferior positional change (cm), and mean dose (Gy) was collected. Differences were assessed by Student's t-test (sig. p<0.05).

resultsThe mean PB volume change from Fx 1→ 19 was +0.34 ± 0.34 cc (p=0.11) and from Fx 1→ 37 was +0.22 ± 0.28 cc (p=0.31). The mean positional change from Fx 1→ 19 was +0.08±0.26 cm (p=0.37) and from Fx 1→ 37 was +0.05 ±0.25 cm (p=0.57). The mean change in mean PB dose from Fx 1→ 19 was +0.19±4.86 Gy (p=0.98) and from Fx 1→ 37 was -1.51≖7.46 Gy (p=0.88).

conclusionWe present the first study evaluating inter-fraction changes to the PB during MR-guided RT. We found no clinically meaningful difference in the volume, positional change, or mean dose during RT in the post-prostatectomy setting, suggesting that PB organ motion may not need to be accounted for in radiation treatment planning.

Indexed as

Erectile DysfunctionProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePenisProstateProstatectomyRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedMRI-guided radiotherapyOrgan motionPenile bulbProstate-bed radiotherapySexual toxicity

Identifiers

PMID35153154
PMCPMC9169576
OpenAlexW4205395278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.