Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35153092›Full record

ArticleVaccine2022

Attitude toward a mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policy and its determinants: Evidence from serial cross-sectional surveys conducted throughout the pandemic in Germany.

Philipp Sprengholz, Lars Korn, Sarah Eitze, Lisa Felgendreff, Regina Siegers, Laura Goldhahn, Freia De Bock, Lena Huebl, Robert Böhm, Cornelia Betsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Do COVID-19 Vaccination Policies Backfire? The Effects of Mandates, Vaccination Passports, and Financial Incentives on COVID-19 Vaccination.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Public policy and conspiracies: The case of mandates.Current opinion in psychology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Attitudes and Beliefs of the Italian Population towards COVID-19 Vaccinations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Philipp SprengholzMedia and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Germany. Electronic address: philipp.sprengholz@uni-erfurt.de.
Lars KornMedia and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Germany; Center for Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, University of Erfurt, Germany.
Sarah EitzeMedia and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Germany; Center for Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, University of Erfurt, Germany.
Lisa FelgendreffMedia and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Germany; Center for Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, University of Erfurt, Germany.
Regina SiegersMedia and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Germany.
Laura GoldhahnMedia and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Germany.
Freia De BockFederal Centre for Health Education (BZgA), Germany.
Lena HueblDepartment of Tropical Medicine, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany; I. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Robert BöhmDepartment of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Copenhagen Center for Social Data Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Cornelia BetschMedia and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Germany; Center for Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, University of Erfurt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMandating vaccination against COVID-19 is often discussed as a means to counter low vaccine uptake. Beyond the potential legal, ethical, and psychological concerns, a successful implementation also needs to consider citizens' support for such a policy. Public attitudes toward vaccination mandates and their determinants might differ over time and, hence, should be monitored.

methodsBetween April 2020 and April 2021, we investigated public support for mandatory vaccination policies in Germany and examined individual correlates, such as vaccination intentions, confidence in vaccine safety, and perceived collective responsibility, using a series of cross-sectional, quota-representative surveys (overall N = 27,509).

resultsSupport for a vaccination mandate declined before the approval of the first vaccine against COVID-19 in December 2020 and increased afterwards. However, at the end of April 2021, only half of respondents were in favor of mandatory regulations. In general, mandates were endorsed by those who considered the vaccines to be safe, anticipated practical barriers, and felt responsible for the collective. On the contrary, perceiving vaccination as unnecessary and weighing the benefits and risks of vaccination was related to lower support. Older individuals and males more often endorsed vaccination mandates than did younger participants and females. Interestingly, there was a gap between vaccination intentions and support for mandates, showing that the attitude toward mandatory vaccination was not only determined by vaccination-related factors such as vaccine safety or prosocial considerations.

conclusionsBecause of low public support, mandatory vaccination against COVID-19 should be considered a measure of last resort in Germany. However, if removing barriers to vaccination and educational campaigns about vaccine safety and the societal benefits of high vaccination uptake are not sufficient for increasing vaccination uptake to the required levels, mandates could be introduced. In this case, measures to ensure and increase acceptance and adherence should be taken.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAttitudeCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMalePolicyCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19MandatesVaccination

Identifiers

PMID35153092
PMCPMC8830774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.