Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35152895›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2022

Tidal volume significantly affects oxygenation in healthy pigs during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared to conventional ventilation.

Karel Roubík, Jakub Ráfl, Martin Rožánek, Petr Kudrna, Mikuláš Mlček

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karel RoubíkDepartment of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, nam. Sitna 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic.
Jakub RáflDepartment of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, nam. Sitna 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic. rafl@fbmi.cvut.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5102-9354
Martin RožánekDepartment of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, nam. Sitna 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic.
Petr KudrnaDepartment of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, nam. Sitna 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic.
Mikuláš MlčekInstitute of Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Albertov 5, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Czech Technical University in Prague · CZCharles University · CZ

Funding

České Vysoké Učení Technické v Praze SGS17/203/OHK4/3T/17České Vysoké Učení Technické v Praze SGS20/202/OHK4/3T/17Univerzita Karlova v Praze Progress 206041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) has long been debated. Numerous studies documented its benefits, whereas several more recent studies did not prove superiority of HFOV over protective conventional mechanical ventilation (CV). One of the accepted explanations is that CV and HFOV act differently, including gas exchange.

methodsTo investigate a different level of coupling or decoupling between oxygenation and carbon dioxide elimination during CV and HFOV, we conducted a prospective crossover animal study in 11 healthy pigs. In each animal, we found a normocapnic tidal volume (V

resultsChanges in P

conclusionA change in P

Indexed as

High-Frequency VentilationPulmonary Gas ExchangeAnimalsLungProspective StudiesSwineTidal VolumeHigh-frequency oscillatory ventilationMechanical ventilationOxygenationTidal volume

Identifiers

PMID35152895
PMCPMC8842876
OpenAlexW4212981872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.