Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35152889›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2022

Age- and muscle-specific reliability of muscle architecture measurements assessed by two-dimensional panoramic ultrasound.

Iris Hagoort, Tibor Hortobágyi, Nicolas Vuillerme, Claudine J C Lamoth, Alessio Murgia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Iris HagoortDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. i.hagoort@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7904-8765
Tibor HortobágyiDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Nicolas VuillermeUniversité Grenoble Alpes, AGEIS, Grenoble, France.
Claudine J C LamothDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Alessio MurgiaDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-10-AIRT-05Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-15-IDEX-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAge-related changes in muscle properties affect daily functioning, therefore a reliable assessment of such properties is required. We examined the effects of age on reliability, muscle quality and interrelation among muscle architecture (MA) parameters of the gastrocnemius medialis (GM), tibialis anterior (TA), and vastus lateralis (VL) muscles.

methodsThree raters scored ultrasound (US) scans of 12 healthy younger and older adults, on fascicle length (FL), pennation angle (PA) and muscle thickness (MT). Intra- and inter-rater reliability of MA measures in rest and contraction was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and standard error of measurements (SEM, SEM%). The relationship between MA parameters was examined using Pearson correlation coefficients. Muscle quality (MQ) was examined using mean pixel intensity.

resultsReliability was moderate to excellent for TA in both groups (ICCs: 0.64-0.99, SEM% = 1.6-14.8%), and for VL in the younger group (ICCs: 0.67-0.98, SEM% = 2.0-18.3%). VL reliability was poor to excellent in older adults (ICCs: 0.22-0.99, SEM% = 2.7-36.0%). For GM, ICCs were good to excellent (ICCs: 0.76-0.99) in both groups, but GM SEM% were higher in older adults (SEM%

conclusionsIn conclusion, age- and muscle-specificities were present in the relationships between MT and PA, and MT and FL at rest. Furthermore, the reliability of MA parameters assessed with 2D panoramic US is acceptable. However, the level of reliability varies with age, muscle and MA measure. In older adults notably, the lowest reliability was observed in the VL muscle. Among the MA parameters, MT appears to be the simplest and most easily reproducible parameter in all muscles and age groups.

Indexed as

Muscle, SkeletalReproducibility of ResultsUltrasonographyAgingEcho intensityMuscle architectureReliabilitySarcopeniaUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID35152889
PMCPMC8842860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.