Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35152369›Full record

SynthesisJournal of occupational rehabilitation2022

Expectations for Return to Work Predict Return to Work in Workers with Low Back Pain: An Individual Participant Data (IPD) Meta-Analysis.

Victoria Sullivan, Maria N Wilson, Douglas P Gross, Ole Kudsk Jensen, William S Shaw, Ivan A Steenstra, Jill A Hayden

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Victoria SullivanDepartment of Community Health & Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada. victoria.sullivan@dal.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-2973-9370
Maria N WilsonDepartment of Community Health & Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Douglas P GrossDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Ole Kudsk JensenSpine Center, University Research Clinic for Innovative Patient Pathways, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark.
William S ShawDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Departments of Medicine and Public Health Sciences, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
Ivan A SteenstraEpidemiologist, Director Program Evaluation & Research Outcomes, LifeWorks, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jill A HaydenDepartment of Community Health & Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Dalhousie University · CARegionshospitalet Silkeborg · DKUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Low back pain is associated with disability and lost productivity due to inability of workers to return to work. Personal recovery expectation beliefs may be associated with return to work outcomes in those with low back pain at high risk for chronic disability. We aimed to (1) assess whether workers' expectations for return to work, following a low back pain episode, are associated with subsequent return to work; and (2) explore the relationships between return to work expectations and other prognostic factors in their association with work outcomes.Methods We conducted an Individual Participant Data (IPD) meta-analysis using data from five prospective cohort studies identified by a Cochrane prognostic factor review. A one-stage IPD meta-analysis approach was applied. Multi-level mixed effects models were used to determine the unadjusted and adjusted associations between expectations and return to work (logistic regression) and time to return to work (parametric survival models with Weibull distribution).Results The final dataset included 2302 participants. Positive expectations for return to work were associated with return to work at follow-up in both unadjusted (Odds Ratio (OR) 2.95; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 2.21, 3.95) (n = 2071) and comprehensively adjusted (OR 2.01; 95% CI 1.46, 2.77) (n = 1109) models. Similar findings were identified for shorter length of time to return to work in both unadjusted (HR 2.40; 95% CI 2.09, 2.75) (n = 1156) and minimally adjusted (HR 2.43; 95% CI 2.12, 2.79) (n = 1154) models.Conclusions Results suggest workers with low expectations for return to work are at increased risk for long-term work disability.

Indexed as

Low Back PainPersons with DisabilitiesHumansMotivationProspective StudiesReturn to WorkLow back painMeta-analysisRehabilitationReturn to work

Identifiers

PMID35152369
OpenAlexW4211125294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.