Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35152306›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2022

Point-of-care ultrasound for neonatal central catheter positioning: impact on X-rays and line tip position accuracy.

Serena Rossi, K Haran Jogeesvaran, Eugen Matu, Hammad Khan, Elisabetta Grande, Virginie Meau-Petit

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Real-time ultrasound to assess the umbilical catheter position in neonates: a randomized, controlled trial.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Insertion technologies for neonatal venous access: a scoping review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Serena RossiNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Evelina London Children's Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St ThomasNorth Wing 6th floor, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 0EH, UK. serestar90@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8966-4967
K Haran JogeesvaranPaediatric Radiology Department, Evelina London Children's Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St ThomasWestminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 0EH, UK.
Eugen MatuNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Evelina London Children's Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St ThomasNorth Wing 6th floor, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 0EH, UK.
Hammad KhanNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Evelina London Children's Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St ThomasNorth Wing 6th floor, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 0EH, UK.
Elisabetta GrandeDepartment of Paediatrics and Neonatology, Ospedale della Misericordia, Grosseto, Italy.
Virginie Meau-PetitNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Evelina London Children's Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St ThomasNorth Wing 6th floor, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 0EH, UK.
St Thomas' Hospital · GBOspedale Misericordia - Grosseto · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective of the study was to compare number of X-rays performed for neonatal central line tip positioning when real-time US is used compared to X-ray only, and to assess consequences on position accuracy, irradiation and cost. Retrospective monocentric cohort study conducted at Evelina London Children's Hospital Neonatal Unit over 6 months. Study was conducted during implementation of US for line tip localisation with formulation of US protocol. Tip position on X-ray was reviewed by one neonatologist and one radiologist and inter-rater agreement calculated. Criteria for good, satisfactory or inadequate position of the tip were defined. Estimated effective radiation dose and cost for each X-ray was determined. Two hundred seventy-four lines were inserted (nPICC, UVC, UAC). Eighty-three lines were scanned with US (US group); 191 lines were not (no-US group). Number of X-rays performed was significantly lower in the US group: 1.19 vs. 1.5 (p 0.001), related to a significantly lower percentage of lines requiring multiple X-rays (38.7% no-US group vs. 19.9% US group; p 0.004). Accuracy was higher in US group with more lines at cavoatrial junction (p 0.05) and was significantly increased with US use for lines inserted from lower limbs (22.9% and 76.2%, p 0.001). Inter-rater agreement was strong (k > 0.8). US group received lower mean radiation dose (p < 0.001) and cost related to X-ray was significantly reduced (p 0.001).

conclusionReal-time US use for line tip positioning in the NICU significantly decreased the number of X-rays performed and was associated with better-positioned lines, decreased irradiation and cost. WHAT IS KNOWN: • The use of point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) by critical care providers in neonatology has increased in recent years. International guidelines advocate for the use of PoCUS as valid guidance to practical procedures in neonatology. • Central catheters (umbilical catheters and neonatal peripherally inserted central catheters) are among the most commonly used devices to support NICU patients. Proper positioning is crucial to avoid complications and PoCUS has high sensitivity and specificity in accurately determining line tip position. The current standard practice for line tip position confirmation in neonatology is still conventional radiography despite multiple evidence suggest significant inaccuracy of X-ray compared to ultrasound. WHAT IS NEW: • PoCUS implementation for line tip positioning leads to a significant decrease in the number of X-rays performed, in radiation effective dose and costs. PoCUS evaluation of central catheters significantly increases the accuracy of the final line tip position with more lines at the cavoatrial junction. • Training is fundamental for univocal interpretation of ultrasound images and an effective learning strategy is being proposed.

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousCatheterization, PeripheralCentral Venous CathetersChildCohort StudiesHumansInfant, NewbornPoint-of-Care SystemsRadiographyRetrospective StudiesX-RaysCentral cathetersNeonatologyPoint-of-care ultrasoundVascular access

Identifiers

PMID35152306
OpenAlexW4213146233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.