Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35152226›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2022

Combination therapy of sorafenib and drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with and without hepatic arteriovenous shunt.

Pin-Ko Chen, Sung-Hua Chiu, Ming-Ting Tsai, Kai-Hsiang Chang, Wei-Chou Chang, Hsuan-Hwai Lin, Cheng-Hsiang Lo, Guo-Shu Huang, Ping-Ying Chang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pin-Ko ChenDepartment of Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, ROC, Taiwan.
Sung-Hua ChiuDepartment of Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, ROC, Taiwan.
Ming-Ting TsaiDepartment of Medical Imaging, China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital, Hsinchu,Taiwan, ROC.
Kai-Hsiang ChangDepartment of Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, ROC, Taiwan.
Wei-Chou ChangDepartment of Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, ROC, Taiwan.
Hsuan-Hwai LinDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Cheng-Hsiang LoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Guo-Shu HuangDepartment of Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, ROC, Taiwan.
Ping-Ying ChangDepartment of Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, ROC, Taiwan.
National Defense Medical Center · TWTri-Service General Hospital · TWChina Medical University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with sorafenib and drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with or without hepatic arteriovenous shunt (HAVS).

methodsThis retrospective, single-center study enrolled 59 advanced HCC patients treated with combination therapy, of whom 33 (55.9%) patients had HAVS. Tumor response according to the mRECIST criteria was evaluated based on the CT images 1 month after TACE, and changes in the arterial enhancement ratio (AER) of tumors and portal vein tumor thrombosis were also documented. Time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and prognostic factors were analyzed. Safety was evaluated with the incidence of TACE-related complications within 6 weeks after TACE.

resultsThe tumor response between the two groups showed no significant difference in the objective response rate (69.2% in the group without HAVS vs 60.6% in the group with HAVS, p = 0.492) or disease control rate (92.3% vs 87.9%, p = 0.685). The two groups showed comparable TTP (4.23 vs 2.33 months, p = 0.235) and OS (12.77 vs 12.97 months, p = 0.910). A drop in the AER of tumors of more than 20% on post-TACE CT independently predicted better OS. With regard to safety, there was no significant difference between the two groups.

conclusionFor advanced HCC, combination therapy had equal efficacy and safety in patients with HAVS compared to those without HAVS, indicating that DEB-TACE is an optional and effective treatment in these patients.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticLiver NeoplasmsHumansRetrospective StudiesSorafenibTreatment OutcomeSorafenib

Identifiers

PMID35152226
PMCPMC12755458
OpenAlexW4212873559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.