ArticleBMC pediatrics2022
Preparing newborn screening for the future: a collaborative stakeholder engagement exploring challenges and opportunities to modernizing the newborn screening system.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Healthcare professionals' views on expanding newborn screening with or without genomics in France: Results of the SeDeN-p2 study.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Role of next generation sequencing in neonatal diagnosis and screening.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Review
- Parents' Experiences of Receiving a Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID) or Non-SCID T-Cell Lymphopenia Outcome During the Newborn Screening Evaluation in England.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Article
- Benchmarking genetic birth prevalence estimates against newborn screening data.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on Integrating Genomic Sequencing into Newborn Screening: An Interview Study.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Article
- Men's Preferences for Exiting Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surveillance: A Deliberative Engagement Session Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Early Intervention services in the era of genomic medicine: setting a research agenda.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- Parental awareness and perspectives on newborn screening in China: a questionnaire-based study.BMC medical ethics · 2024Article
- Genomic sequencing for newborn screening: current perspectives and challenges.Croatian medical journal · 2024Review
- Current Status of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Worldwide 2024: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Activities (2020-2023).International journal of neonatal screening · 2024Review
- ScreenPlus: A comprehensive, multi-disorder newborn screening program.Molecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2024Article
- Landscape Analysis of Neurodevelopmental Comorbidities in Newborn Screening Conditions: Challenges and Opportunities.International journal of neonatal screening · 2024Article
- Assessing interstate racial and socioeconomic disparities in newborn screening policies in the United States.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- [Development of analytics in newborn screening-from the Guthrie card to genetics].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2023Review
- Parental Awareness, Knowledge, and Attitudes Regarding Current and Future Newborn Bloodspot Screening: The First Report from Thailand.International journal of neonatal screening · 2023Article
- Newbornscreening SMA - From Pilot Project to Nationwide Screening in Germany.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2023Article
- Parental Burden and Quality of Life in 5q-SMA Diagnosed by Newborn Screening.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Newborn screening research sponsored by the NIH: From diagnostic paradigms to precision therapeutics.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2022Article
- Diagnostic experiences of Duchenne families and their preferences for newborn screening: A mixed-methods study.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2022Article
- A Window of Opportunity for Newborn Screening.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesProjections that 60 transformative cell and gene therapies could be approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) within 10 years underscore an urgent need to modernize the newborn screening (NBS) system. This study convened expert stakeholders to assess challenges to the NBS system and propose solutions for its modernization.
methodsNBS stakeholders (researchers, clinicians, state NBS leaders, advocates, industry professionals, and current/former advisory committee members) participated in one of five mixed-stakeholder panel discussions. Prior to panels, participants completed a survey in which they reviewed and ranked NBS challenges generated from relevant literature. During panels, participants deliberated on challenges and explored potential solutions. Pre-panel survey data were analyzed descriptively. Data from panel discussions were analyzed using a rapid qualitative analysis.
resultsMedian scores of the ranked challenges (1 = most important) reveal the top three most important barriers to address: critical missing data for NBS decision-making (Median = 2), burden on state NBS laboratories (Median = 3), and the amount of time required for state-level implementation of screening for new conditions (Median = 4). Panel discussions were rooted in recurring themes: the infant's well-being should be the focal point; the transformative therapy pipeline, although undeniably positive for individuals with rare diseases, is a threat to NBS capacity; decisions about modernizing NBS should be evidence-based; additional financial support is required but not sufficient for modernization; and modernization will require participation of multiple NBS stakeholders. This final overarching theme is reported in depth, including expertise, coordination, and collaboration challenges facing NBS and novel approaches to oversight, partnership, and coordination that were suggested by participants.
conclusionsThis study engaged representatives from multiple stakeholder groups to generate potential solutions to challenges facing NBS in the United States. These solutions provide a rich starting point for policy makers and other stakeholders who desire to maximize the impact of new transformative therapies for babies, families, and society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.